Stephen King has come up with some scary scenarios in his horror stories. So have Alfred Hitchcock, Edgar Allen Poe and Bram Stoker.

But none envisioned what a stunning new research paper has confirmed: There are human remains in America’s water systems.

The horror is the result of America’s new abortion industry agenda to deliver chemical abortion drugs to women.

The research paper, “Abortion in our Water, A Special report: Chemical Home Abortions & the Disposition of Aborted Fetal Remains,” comes from Liberty Counsel Action.

“This is an unfolding environmental and public health crisis,” John Stemberger, chief of Liberty Counsel Action. “The same water that Americans use to drink, cook, and bathe in may contain residuals from powerful, lethal abortion drugs. No one voted for this, and if folks were aware, there would be public outcry. We are all living with these consequences. The EPA instructs Americans not to flush baby wipes, tampons, or goldfish, and yet it allows abortion providers to use wastewater treatment facilities as medical waste facilities and biohazard centers – flushing human fetal tissues that include newly formed organs, placenta, and bone fragments.”

The 86-page paper contains an executive summary and is documented with 335 footnotes. Its primary author is Abigail Forman, a former legislator from Minnesota who serves as a researcher and policy analyst with Liberty Counsel Action, an organization chaired by constitutional law attorney Mat Staver, chief of Liberty Counsel, which has fought some of the biggest fights for the pro-life beliefs across the nation.

The paper documents how an estimated 30-40 tons of hazardous medical waste, including human remains, are being flushed.

It analyzes the impacts of flushing the abortion pill, Mifepristone, and other chemical abortion drugs and their residue, each year.

It draws of a variety of studies and peer-reviewed research, petitions to the EPA, government resources and interviews with water treatment experts.

It draws attention to:

The likely introduction of the chemical byproducts of Mifepristone, which act as endocrine disruptors and are not removed by conventional wastewater treatment, into our drinking water supplies.

The presence of human fetal tissue biomarkers in drinking water sources.

A significant gap in federal environmental regulations concerning medical waste disposal from at-home abortions.

The complete absence of environmental impact studies before the drug Mifepristone was approved by the FDA.

The violation of several state and federal laws by the EPA and FDA, including the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.

The report notes President Donald Trump repeatedly has called for “crystal-clean water” and it now calls on him to act.

The report also calls on Congress and federal agencies to immediately investigate the oversight failures related to the original and subsequent approvals of Mifepristone and propose new regulations that treat “at-home” chemical abortions with the same environmental scrutiny as hospital-based procedures.

The report notes that the original application for FDA approval of the abortion chemicals was flawed because it claimed, citing an environmental assessment from the Population Council, that the impact of the drug on the environment would be minimal.

There was no consideration of the human remains.

“These gross oversights amount to clear violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Clean Water Act (CWA),” the report charges.

“Students for Life of America estimates that 40+ tons of chemically tainted medical waste have entered our wastewater treatment plants, which, in any other context, would be a national scandal. As it pertains to other possible human harms, it is important to note mifepristone acts as an endocrine disruptor (a chemical that may mimic or interfere with a body’s hormones) by blocking a vital fertility hormone. Mifepristone is also known to form ‘active metabolites,’ that is, metabolites that retain therapeutic effects. After being excreted by women, these metabolites enter wastewater treatment plants—most of which are not designed to remove them—and may end up in our water supply,” it warns.

Bob Unruh

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is currently a news editor for the WND News Center, and also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially. Read more of Bob Unruh's articles here.