Screenshot: Fox News

FBI Director Kash Patel has launched a “Grand Criminal Conspiracy” investigation into the decade-long weaponization of the federal government — a probe that specifically circumvents the statute of limitations, allowing investigators to finally pursue justice for long-buried crimes.

According to a report by JustTheNews, Barack Obama, John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, and other high-level Obama-era operatives have been named in the investigation, which shows a coordinated criminal conspiracy to target political enemies, shield Democrat allies, and manipulate multiple presidential elections — from 2016 through 2024.

But it gets better: The probe may now shift jurisdiction to Florida — thanks to none other than Special Counsel Jack Smith’s own raid on Mar-a-Lago.

The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Solomon teased that within the next 10 days, bombshell revelations would be made public — possibly exposing how weaponized federal agencies colluded to rig the political landscape against Trump and deceive the American people.

Solomon: “I think next week — over the next 10 days — the base who’s been wondering, “Where’s all that accountability?” is going to get some big surprises. Over the next week, we’ll learn where the conspiracy began — a few weeks before Crossfire Hurricane was opened — and when it ended, all the way in 2024, when they were still trying to pursue Donald Trump to keep him from winning the presidency.

There’s a big case that’s been built by the Justice Department and the FBI.

It’s been masked by a lot of this infighting and drama and soap opera. The matter is — MAGA-base Americans are going to be happy when they see where this is all heading in the next few weeks.

Kash Patel is going nowhere.”

During an interview with Sean Hannity, Solomon said that under the leadership of Director Kash Patel, the FBI has officially opened a grand criminal conspiracy case designed to circumvent the statute of limitations and expose years of unprecedented weaponization of government agencies against President Donald Trump.

Sean Hannity:
According to a bombshell report from JustTheNews.com, the FBI is now seeking answers to years of weaponization of the federal government, opening the door for a special prosecutor to look into everything — starting with the Russia, Russia, Russia collusion hoax — all the way through Jack Smith and what impact it may have had on the elections, intervening in 2016, 2020, and 2024.

Sean Hannity:
You wrote a very long, comprehensive investigative piece about how the FBI opened a case several weeks ago under the new FBI Director, Kash Patel, and that this would be a grand conspiracy case on the issue of weaponization.

We were right about FISA abuse. We were right about the double standard in terms of top-secret classified information. But what I’m reading in your piece tells me that, starting with the Russia hoax and going all the way through Jack Smith, we’re talking about every incident of weaponization used against Donald Trump — and how it could be part of a broader, grander conspiracy that actually took place, with lawbreaking involved.

And also, that the statute of limitations would not be applicable in this case as a result. This would include names like Comey and Clapper and Brennan. Take it from there.

John Solomon:
Yeah — and Barack Obama, too, because he was in on these early meetings.  What the FBI has done is treated the last decade of weaponization — all the great work that James Comer has turned up through his Oversight Committee — and put it into a timetable.

They said: this looks like an ongoing conspiracy — a “wash, rinse, repeat” cycle of: Democrat gets in legal trouble (Hillary Clinton in her email case, Hunter Biden with his taxes, Joe Biden with his classified documents), and they’re let off the hook, even when there is extraordinary evidence suggesting they shouldn’t be.

Then a parallel track occurs, where the Republican — in this case, Donald Trump — is investigated falsely for things like Russia collusion, Ukrainian interference, and his own home at Mar-a-Lago.

This is a criminal conspiracy. And by treating it as a conspiracy, you eliminate the five-year statutes on individual crimes. So if something happened in 2016, but it was part of an ongoing conspiracy that continued with Jack Smith raiding Donald Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago, it can be charged in the larger conspiracy. Even though, if you tried to charge it as an individual case, you wouldn’t get it.

Furthermore, you could also change the venue.

John Solomon:
Remember the troubles John Durham had bringing prosecutions to Washington, D.C.? Jurors wouldn’t convict — even if they thought there was criminality going on.

In this case, you could pick a place like Florida — where Jack Smith did the raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home — and say, “That’s where we’re putting the grand jury.” You’d get a more fair jury pool, a more fair grand jury pool.

It gives Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, an enormous amount of flexibility to do something historic — finally bring some accountability for all the things that Chairman Comer, Chairman Johnson, Chairman Grassley, and Chairman Jordan have brought and proven to the American people.

Sean Hannity:
Yeah, okay. Bring us a little deeper into this and, more specifically, tell us what this might entail — who might be appointed special counsel, how long this investigation is likely to take, and how involved will it be?

Because we’ve talked at length on this program — maybe more than any other show — about how the deep state, these three-letter agencies, have been using and abusing their power. I don’t care if it’s the 51 intel agents who knew nothing about Hunter’s laptop. I don’t care if it’s Russia-Russia. I don’t care if it’s a false valuation of Mar-a-Lago. I don’t care if it’s a double standard when it comes to top-secret classified documents — how Trump was treated versus Biden versus Hillary Clinton.

There’s a lot to unpack there.

John Solomon:
There is. There’s a couple of things.

First, because of the great work of Chairman Comer, Chairman Jordan, Chairman Johnson, and Chairman Grassley, most of the evidence is already available to the Justice Department. You’re not going to have to pry it out.

Now, there are two pieces of evidence that Donald Trump could declassify — they are still classified — and they would be explosive. They would put it at the start of the conspiracy.

Hillary Clinton was cleared from her email scandal by James Comey shortly after the FBI got new classified evidence from an intelligence agency saying there might be more criminality. It never got investigated — it got swept under the rug. The evidence exists in a classified annex in the Justice Department’s investigations of documents.

If Donald Trump were to declassify that, he would put this investigation on fast-forward.

Same thing with the day that Donald Trump was being investigated at the start of Russia collusion: an intelligence intercept comes in saying that Hillary Clinton approved doing a Russian collusion dirty trick on Donald Trump — essentially sticking a fake scandal on him. Instead of the FBI taking that into account, they opened up on that very allegation and ignored the evidence — which defies all investigative rules that the FBI has.

John Solomon:
If Donald Trump declassified those two pieces of intelligence, a special prosecutor would have a jumpstart. This could be wrapped up in a couple of years.

You could pick anybody. You don’t have to pick someone in the Justice Department. You could pick a Senate-confirmed person — like Lee Zeldin — and get a prosecutor going.

Sean Hannity:
And he’s a lawyer, so that would be a good choice in my view.

John Solomon:
He’s a lawyer and a prosecutor, yeah, man.

WATCH:

Jim Hᴏft Jim Hᴏft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.

You can email Jim Hᴏft here, and read more of Jim Hᴏft's articles here.