Some Democrats have not only been showing their true colors, but wearing them proudly in the aftermath of the Charlie Kirk assassination, as they publicly double down on their disgusting remarks about the Turning Point founder.

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) is one of the worst offenders, who was confronted by CNN’s Kaitlan Collins for her “jarring” comments about Charlie Kirk after his murder.

“What I find jarring is that there’s so many people willing to excuse the most reprehensible things that he said that they agree with, that they’re willing to have monuments for him, that they want to create a day to honor him, and that they want to produce resolutions in the House of Congress, honoring his life and legacy,” Omar said on CNN.

“It is one thing to care about his life because obviously so many people loved him, including his children and wife, but I am not going to sit here and be judged for not wanting to honor any legacy this man has left behind. That should be in the dustbin of history, and we should hopefully move on and forget the hate that he spewed every single day,” she added.

Omar isn’t alone in her open disdain for the late Charlie Kirk.

“We should be clear about who Charlie Kirk was: a man who believed that the Civil Rights Act that granted Black Americans the right to vote was a ‘mistake,’ who after the violent attack on Paul Pelosi claimed that ‘some amazing patriot out there’ should bail out his assailant, and accused Jews of controlling ‘not just the colleges — it’s the nonprofits, it's the movies, it’s Hollywood, it’s all of it,’” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) wrote in a post on X.

While spouting information that BlazeTV host Stu Burguiere explains is “completely made up,” the congresswoman went on to claim that his “rhetoric and beliefs were ignorant.”

“They’ll break any rule to stay on point here,” Stu says. “Their point of course being, ‘We can’t honor Charlie Kirk as a person because he said something I didn’t like once.’ Now, of course, people say stuff that I don’t like all the time. I still can be sad when they get killed.”

But it doesn’t end with AOC, as Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) made sure her opinion was known as well.

“A resolution that came before the House this past week honoring Charlie Kirk, and there were 58 Democrats who voted against it. You were one. Why?” CNN’s Dana Bash asked Crockett in an interview.

“When I saw the ‘no’ votes, there were only two Caucasians. For the most part, the only people that voted ‘no’ were people of color,” Crockett said. “Because the rhetoric that Charlie Kirk continuously put out there was rhetoric that specifically targeted people of color. And so, it is unfortunate that even our colleagues could not see how harmful his rhetoric was specifically to us.”

“So if there was any way that I was going to honor somebody who decided that they were going to negatively talk about me and proclaim that I was somehow involved in the ‘Great White Replacement,’ yeah, I’m not honoring that kind of stuff,” she added.

Stu is shocked, saying, “Blatant lies.”

“I mean, it’s just incredible that even after a man is just shot in front of our eyes, they can’t even bring themselves to say anything that’s true,” he adds. “It is really fascinating, the discipline.”

Want more from Stu?

To enjoy more of Stu's lethal wit, wisdom, and mockery, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.