đź”»The Social Security Math No One Wants You To Do - Cypher News

www.cypher-news.com

[ CYPHER CODE #813 ]
Social Security is sold as something you earn, but structured as something you qualify for.

[ CYPHER CODE #814 ]
Paying in does not create ownership. It creates dependency on timing.

[ CYPHER CODE #815 ]
Delaying benefits is framed as responsibility, but often guarantees lower lifetime returns.

BRIEFING

Grant here. Social Security is one of those things that people and politicians have been questioning for decades, but it isn’t until the rubber really hits the road that they fully understand how much this system sucks. But there’s a video out there that hits the issue at its core because it forces people to do the one thing the Social Security system depends on them not doing: the math. Let’s break it down.

In the video, a young woman describes her utter disbelief when both of her parents died and she was able to see with complete clarity what exactly they paid into Social Security versus what they received. And what you’re hearing from this grieving daughter isn’t confusion about policy, but it’s simply shock at how the numbers stack up.

Look at it this way: you have two people work their entire lives, pay in faithfully, delay benefits like they’re told to, and then die early enough that most of what they contributed never comes back to their household. Not because of a mistake, but because of how the system is built.

SOURCE

Subscribe today
Cut through the noise, the spin, and the propaganda.

What we’re seeing here is a real-life example of just how archaic and outdated Social Security really is.

But when you really dig deeper, there are even more examples that show just what an absolute joke the program is. Especially when you factor in today’s cost of living and inflation.

For example, the Social Security Administration still pays a one-time lump-sum death benefit of $255. This is a nominal amount set decades ago, which was intended to provide something to surviving spouses and maybe their children.

However, let’s be 100% honest, that amount isn’t even enough to pay for two bouquets of funeral flowers. And when you factor in the bureaucratic hoops you’ll have to jump through to get this staggering $255, you have to really stop and wonder if it’s even worth it.

SOURCE

A spouse might get a one-time death benefit payment of $255. If there’s no spouse, some children may be eligible, including those who are:

  • Age 17 or younger, or,
  • Ages 18–19 and in school (K–12) full time or,
  • Any age if they developed a disability at age 21 or younger.

    • A spouse who doesn’t live in the same home may be eligible if they can get benefits based on the record of the person who died. You must apply for this payment within 2 years of the family member’s death.

    DEBRIEFING

    What this video and the overall math expose here is that the main problem with Social Security isn’t so much the structure necessarily, but it’s the fact that it’s aged worse than a $2 hooker.

    Social Security was built for a very different economy, a very different lifespan, and a very different cost of living. It has never been meaningfully updated to reflect modern reality, yet it’s still sold as a reliable backstop for old age and death. This program was started back in 1935 and it’s definitely showing its age.

    And that pathetic $255 death benefit is the clearest symbol that shows how far gone this program is. It exists largely as a formality, not as meaningful support. In a world where end-of-life costs routinely run into the tens of thousands, the benefit functions more as a consolation prize than anything else.

    What families are discovering, often too late, is that Social Security isn’t designed to mirror contribution or provide proportional return. It’s designed to distribute baseline support under narrow conditions, regardless of how much was paid in or how long someone lived.

    NOW YOU KNOW

    Social Security isn’t outdated by accident. It’s outdated by neglect.