Judges: aliens among us

www.americanthinker.com

You have to credit the White House for telling it like it is.

On their new webpage concerning the threat posed by mass illegal immigration, it states that illegals are aliens among us.

Not surprisingly, this is viewed by the Democrats and liberal media as a “grotesque violation” against human rights, and an expression of “white supremacy.” The president is accused of anti-immigrant bias. Apparently, enforcing constitutional law regarding borders, immigration, and security is a form of discrimination.

The Left doesn’t want to face the actual reason the White House is rightly taking this position: the U.S. has been invaded by millions of undocumented, unknown, unverified foreigners, many criminals, many looking for public assistance, and some with intentions to commit crime including, plausibly, through domestic “terror cells.”

In wartime, this is made a further risk as fundamentalist ideology among thousands of illegals from the Middle East, is being appropriated by the political Left, and pitted against conservative policy as a cause for retribution and revenge. The Left even uses the language of a new “civil war.”

This is being effectively supported and procedurally protected by judges.

As you read and piece together one key court decision after another, it appears reasonable to conclude that a number of judges are making rulings clothed in legalese, but in reality are partisan political favors. They behave less like judges, and more like operators.

But it’s worse than that.

Judges in some divisions are also organizing emotionally, almost like a union labor group, complaining that immigration courts are being overloaded, their workload getting too heavy, the court system strained, and many of their colleagues wrongly fired by the DOJ as it works to clean house.

Judges have only themselves to blame.

They have little insight or perspective into the organized political operations that were used to commit one of the greatest violations of constitutional law in U.S. history. That includes not only the financing of mass illegal migration across the border, but then conducting a highly organized military-style airlift campaign to disperse and embed them by the millions, across the country. They were then pinpoint-deposited by an equally organized ground operation, coordinated with city governments.

The violations in U.S. civil air law alone are staggering: airlifting illegals across borders in the middle of the night to New York is no different than running drug smuggling operations from Central America across state lines to Arkansas.

Many judges however, either see immigration strictly in terms of personality, stemming from the president, or they now cast blame on the court system because it can’t process all the cases, and necessary deportations.

The one thing they won’t blame is themselves, while they stood idly by as the Obama-Biden administration flagrantly broke the law.

A group of 35 former federal judges recently felt compelled to actually file a motion to reopen a settled case involving the president, stating their fierce disagreement with the outcome, supported with elaborate legal arguments, but not a peep of similar protest occurred from their peers over national security and constitutional law, as millions of migrants poured into the country illegally.

What this means as far as the continued legitimacy of the judiciary, is a question. It also throws the “equal but separate branches” doctrine into further disarray, as the legal system too often acts as an arm of the DNC, or is effectively fused with it — and works against the priorities of citizens and country.

In this way, the institutional border that was designed to protect judicial integrity, is like the nation’s border that was designed to protect national sovereignty: Both have been compromised, and both have enemies within.

Matthew G. Andersson is a former CEO, and law and policy author. He has testified before the US Senate and is a graduate of the University of Chicago and the University of Texas at Austin.

Image: Grok, ai-generated illustration