The Los Angeles City Council has ignited fury among conservatives after approving a plan to let noncitizens vote in local elections, a move Republican leaders are calling dangerous, misguided, and flatly un-American.

The council voted to place the proposal on the November 3 general election ballot, meaning voters could soon decide whether individuals who are not U.S. citizens can have a say in city matters.

Los Angeles County Republican Party Chair Roxanne Hoge blasted the decision with sharp criticism, calling the council’s priorities “an affront to all Americans.”

In an email to The Center Square, she ridiculed the body for failing in its basic duties while trying to rewrite who gets to participate in democracy.

“Yesterday’s vote by the LA City Council, a body that cannot keep its streets clean of filth, save the lives of broken drug-addicted souls in encampments, fight fires, or stop crime, is an affront to all Americans,” Hoge declared.

Hoge, who immigrated from Jamaica and became a naturalized citizen, made clear why she views the right to vote as sacred.

“As a naturalized American citizen, the right to vote in this country’s elections is incredibly important to me,” she said.

“It is a privilege that is properly reserved for people who are either born here or love the U.S.A. enough to make a commitment to follow its laws and swear an oath to protect and defend and follow our constitution, and who then choose to register to vote.”

Her message struck a chord with many conservatives in California who see this as yet another attempt by progressives to water down the meaning of citizenship.

Hoge said granting noncitizens the power to vote would unleash confusion, weaken election integrity, and further erode public trust in a state where voters already question the fairness of the system.

“Giving noncitizens the ability to vote in our elections is a logistical nightmare that would erode trust in our already-tainted system in California and is wrong,” she added.

The controversial plan came from Councilmember Hugo Soto Martinez of District 13, a hard-left member of the Democratic Socialist caucus.

He argued the measure simply follows the lead of San Francisco, where noncitizens are allowed to vote in school board elections.

Soto Martinez said Los Angeles needs to “modernize” its laws to reflect what he calls the city’s “diverse reality.”

That means giving local voting rights to residents who have not sworn allegiance to the United States.

Soto Martinez has been clear that even if voters approve the measure, it would take time before it is implemented.

WATCH:

During a recent Rules Committee meeting, he explained that any change would need a separate ordinance passed by the council and signed by the mayor.

“This gives us the time and flexibility to get it right, to build in safeguards, to protect people’s security and to ensure any policy can withstand legal challenges,” Soto Martinez said.

Critics say his soft assurances are worthless because the premise itself undermines the rule of law.

Los Angeles, they argue, already suffers under lawless policies that encourage illegal immigration, homelessness, crime, and corruption.

To these critics, letting noncitizens vote does not make the city stronger or fairer. It simply signals that citizenship is no longer valued.

Legal experts have also predicted the proposal would face immediate challenges in court.

California’s constitution ties the right to vote to citizenship, and while local measures have occasionally tested that limit, courts have often stepped in to block the attempts.

If Los Angeles moves forward, it could ignite another high-profile battle over election integrity in blue-controlled states and cities.

The city council’s quiet push to move this onto the ballot came with little fanfare but plenty of implications.

Conservatives warn it could open the door to extending voting rights to illegal immigrants under the guise of “inclusivity.”

Meanwhile, progressives see it as a test case for expanding voting privileges nationwide, turning cities like Los Angeles into laboratories for left-wing experiments.

For Republicans, the Los Angeles move is more proof that Democrats will do whatever it takes to secure control, even if that means diluting the meaning of citizenship.

To them, this is not about inclusion but about power. Hoge’s words captured the sentiment of many who believe the vote is a betrayal of those who earned their citizenship through legal channels.

The Center Square reached out to both Soto Martinez’s office and the White House Press Office to comment on the council’s vote, but neither responded.

Perhaps that silence says enough. With Los Angeles descending further into chaos and dysfunction, voters may soon have to decide whether their city will continue down this reckless path or draw the line at defending what citizenship still means.