Julie Kelly Shares DOOZY of a Thread Detailing Jack Smith's Newly Released Transcript Lie by DAMNING Lie
Julie Kelly has been good enough to rip Special Counsel Jack Smith's freshly released House Judiciary transcript to SHREDS methodically and lie-by-lie in a fairly damning thread we had to share.
Advertisement
Sure, we already knew Smith was a douch-waffle, but this? Woof.
Take a gander.
NEW: Jack Smith's transcript released.
🧵on his misrepresentations, falsehoods, and straight up lies told by the special counsel to House Judiciary Committee on Dec 17.
Smith had no evidence that any of the so-called "classified documents" he claimed to have found were in boxes… pic.twitter.com/CjDWJyRNRq
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 31, 2025
Post continues:
... temporarily stored in MAL ballroom or bathroom after the president left the White House.
Smith had no evidence.
Color us SHOCKED.
Lie #2:
Smith was extremely aware of the 2024 election calendar--which is why he took what he himself described as the "extraordinary" step in asking the Supreme Court to bypass the DC appellate court--the next normal step-- in considering Judge Chutkan's Dec. 2023 order denying… pic.twitter.com/x9De8NiPF1
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 31, 2025
Post continues:
... all forms of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution and take up the immunity question immediately. (SCOTUS denied his request, Chutkan's order was upheld by 3-judge panel in Feb. 2024, which was then considered by SCOTUS in April. On July 1, 2024, SCOTUS issued its decision providing for a broad swath of immunity for acts in office, resulting in a major gutting of Smith's J6 indictment.)
In other words, sounds like Smith wanted to find a way to prosecute Trump before he could run for president again.
Recommended
Advertisement
Ahem.
Lie #3: That the unarmed protest at the Capitol on Jan 6 was an "attack" incited by the president and the still unsubstantiated allegation that 140 officers were injured by protesters.
Keep in mind: Smith's J6 indictment was four counts: two related to 1512(c)(2)--a corporate… pic.twitter.com/wMayP6iT7P
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 31, 2025
Post continues:
... fraud statute unlawfully used in J6 cases according to SCOTUS in the Fischer decision--and two other VERY vague conspiracy counts, conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy against "rights."
Key words here: VERY VAGUE.
Lie #4: That Trump's tweet at 2:24pm saying "Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country" somehow "endangered" Pence's life.
Trump did not have to be "pushed" by staff to denounce the escalating chaos--this is a lie pushed by Liz… pic.twitter.com/gGEWNlIaJs
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 31, 2025
Post continues:
... Liz Cheney and others here repeated by Jack Smith--that the president delayed saying anything to stop his supporters from doing anything bad.The first breach into the Capitol happened at 2:12pm. About 25 minutes later, Trump posted his first of several tweets/videos asking people to "stay peaceful" and respect police:
Ugh, Liz Cheney. Man, she is such a huge disappointment on so many levels.
Lie #5: Twitter (which had been recently purchased by Elon Musk) did not "refuse to comply" with Judge Beryl Howell's egregious nondisclosure order in Smith's pursuit of the president's Twitter data.
She set an unreasonable deadline to produce the file and as Twitter sought… pic.twitter.com/1GwLBTo6Pl
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 31, 2025
Advertisement
Post continues:
... relief from DC appellate court--Howell, the Trump-hating Obama appointee, was upheld by 1 Obama and 2 Biden appointees--then fined Twitter $350,000 for an alleged 55 hour "delay" in producing the data to Smith. She also suggested Musk was trying to "get in good" with Trump by fighting the NDO.
And Howell did not just find "obstruction" in her justification for issuing the NDO. (What obstruction Smith is referring to in the J6 case is anyone's guess.)
Smith at first claimed Trump was a flight risk--one of 5 factors necessary under the Stored Communications Act in authorizing an NDO for a subpoena issued to a communications provider--in seeking the NDO. In a hearing on the matter, Howell openly mused that Trump owned his own plane and could flee the country if he found out about the subpoena.
Both later claimed it was done in "error." The NDO, however, argued Trump would destroy evidence or tamper with witnesses if Twitter disclosed the subpoena to him. It was in effect for one year.
Although the all-Dem appellate panel upheld Howell, four conservative appellate court judges later blasted Howell and their colleagues for ignoring executive privilege protections in the case.
Done in error.
RIGHT.
Lie #6: No, a former president is not just any "normal person" when it comes to certain records and documents. In fact, a NARA official testified that every president has kept classified records.
Smith's prosecutors had to admit to Judge Cannon in the docs case that this was the… pic.twitter.com/ENegPJXFEL
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 31, 2025
Advertisement
Post continues:
... first time a high ranking elected official had been charged with espionage for having (alleged) classified papers. There was nothing "normal" about the documents investigation/prosecution.
Further--the SCIF in Miami was not "convenient" for the president or his team of lawyers. Also if I recall correctly, Smith's team insisted on being near or inside the SCIF when the president and/or his team viewed sensitive evidence.
What Smith is suggesting here--and what his team also tried to do with no success--was force the president and his lawyers to travel to DC (where the documents case inappropriately was investigated before Smith's switched venue at the last minute) but (again if memory serves) Judge Cannon directed Smith to make classified discovery available in Florida.
Dirty dirty dirty.
Not really a lie but definitely a misrepresentation of Smith's push to schedule proceedings very quickly and in an unreasonable manner given the president's other court obligations.
Smith testimony on left. Court transcript of relevant court hearing in FLA on the right.
Jay… pic.twitter.com/jNwiUxe9sw
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) December 31, 2025
Post continues:
Jay Bratt urged Judge Cannon to force Trump and his lawyers to appear in court on the one day off in the NY case in the beginning of April. She said no.
The word of the day, ladies and gents, is CORRUPTION. Then again, we're pretty sure that was the word of the day for the entire Biden administration.
Advertisement
============================================================
Related:
TOOL BAG Aaron Rupar TROUNCED for Deliberately Cropping Charity Context From Auction to Smear Trump
============================================================
Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.
Join Twitchy VIP today and use promo code MERRY74 to get 74% off your VIP membership.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!