In the latest episode of “FBI Leadership Theater,” Director Kash Patel has stepped onto the stage to drop a mic—figuratively, but you get the image. Patel asserts that 274 plainclothes agents were deployed to the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021—exclusively after “the riot” had been officially declared—and claims that Christopher Wray lied to Congress when he denied that any FBI sources or agents were embedded among the crowd.

Advertisement

Let’s pause and digest that. The head of the FBI, under a prior administration, disavows his own public testimony. Meanwhile, the current “leader” of that agency cavalierly informs us that the standard protocols—never ever put agents into crowd control missions—were tossed aside by political machinations.

It is a simple enough plotline: Wray, the continuity candidate, testifies to Congress that no agents were operating within the riot crowd. Later, Patel clarifies: yes, they were there, they were doing crowd control (against FBI policy), and Wray’s testimony was a cheat code for plausible deniability.

What does it say about the two-party “establishment” that it allowed Wray’s regime to stand, lie, and supplant facts until someone with political cover stepped in to reverse it? It says that truth is a negotiable commodity in Washington—at least for the insiders who maintain their seats in the revolving doors.

A few things stand out in Patel’s account. First, this was not just a miscommunication, but a violation of policy. Putting FBI agents into crowd control is outside the bounds of what agents are trained or chartered to do. Patel’s claim that the action “goes against FBI standards” is not a footnote—it’s a confession of systemic dereliction. Second, the timing. Patel stresses that agents arrived after the riot was declared, not in anticipation of it. So the narrative that they were embedded to monitor or infiltrate is softened to one of reactive deployment—but still, it was deployment in the chaos. Third, Wray’s “D.C. answer.” Patel accuses Wray of deflecting under oath and refusing to state plainly whether agents were in or around the crowd—even though such a basic fact lies at the heart of Congress’s inquiry.

Recommended

Advertisement

Fourth, the complicity of both parties cannot be overlooked. The establishment—Republican and Democrat—enabled this by refusing accountability. Wray’s confirmation, retention, and protection were bipartisan decisions. His lies had a captive audience that preferred a sanitized narrative to uncomfortable truth. And fifth, the cover-up itself is not an accident. Whether Wray misled intentionally or “erred” will be debated. What’s unmistakable is that the lie served a broader strategy: protect the institution, not the people; preserve the image, not the integrity.

When an FBI director can serve as architect of both truth and falsehood, and when Congress reacts only when the press demands it, we are left with a system that has metastasized corruption—and hypocrisy is its bloodstream. Consider: the same parties that damned previous administrations for “mishandling” Jan. 6 now look the other way when their own man in the FBI is exposed. The inertia is deafening. Accountability is optional. Institutional loyalty comes first. Truth is optional.

This is not a scandal in the margins. This is the engine room of the administrative state, running in dark mode: opacity, control, and narrative dominance. Wray was the midwife to that regime. Patel now—and rightly—pulls back the curtain to show the stagehands. But will the same Congress that confirmed Wray demand consequences now? Don’t hold your breath.

Christopher Wray’s tenure was never about law enforcement. It was about optics, narratives, and protecting powerful interests. He told Congress what he needed to say to survive—and now the man who replaced him is telling us what really happened, in whose shadow those lies were spoken.

Advertisement

The American people deserve more than “he misspoke under oath.” They deserve a reckoning. A full accounting. The removal of complicit actors. An overhaul of the system that allowed fidelity to power to supersede fidelity to truth.

So here’s the bottom line: There is no room in a republic for an intelligence agency that lies to its overseers with impunity—and a Congress that watches nearly every lie pass.

It’s not just Christopher Wray who needs explaining—it’s the entire managerial class that insisted he get away with it. If we can’t stomach that kind of graft and governance, we might as well admit the establishment is the problem, not the solution.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!