Zero Sympathy for the Democrats’ Political Death March – The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

spectator.org

Primary season is just about over in advance of the 2026 midterms, and it looks like the old-time party faithful on the Democrat side are awfully disappointed with how things sit.

PJ Media’s Matt Margolis noted that the big midterm wave they’ve been insisting was coming is… not inevitable.

On the surface, it looks like Democrats should be able to win easily. Aside from precedent, Donald Trump’s polling gives them even more room to work with. Yet recent surveys suggest Democrats are underperforming badly enough that the wave they were counting on might not materialize.

That underperformance could cost them control of the House.

If Republicans hold the House this November, the reasons will be obvious: a socialist insurgency reshaping the party from within, and a singular obsession with opposing Trump that has crowded out everything else voters actually care about.

The evidence is already sitting in the polling.

On the generic congressional ballot, Republicans are either tied with Democrats or ahead by three to four points, nowhere near the margin Democrats need to flip the House. A recent Washington Post/Ipsos poll put Democrats up just 48 percent to 45 percent on that same generic ballot question. Asked which party they agree with more on the issues that matter to them, voters split 41 percent Republican to 40 percent Democrat. Asked which party they trust more to handle the economy, the gap widened: 39 percent for Republicans to 35 percent for Democrats.

Along with that rather underwhelming showing thus far comes what comes off as pre-recriminations. For example, here’s Van Jones…

And Bill Maher, who admittedly has been griping about the state of the Democrat Party for some time now…

Not to mention James Carville, who’s too old and too crazy to be relevant anymore, but his screaming about where that party is keeps getting louder…

And then there’s this guy, who was a somebody in the Clinton administration…

I could show you lots of other examples of the old-school Democrats coming out of the woodwork to sound the alarm about the Democratic Socialists of America turning out enough radicals to win low-turnout party primaries around the country — and tubing the chances of that massive wave election they’ve all but guaranteed themselves. (RELATED: Where Are the Bill Kristols and Michael Steeles on the Democrat Side Today?)

Listen to talk radio or the conservative commentariat, and what you get is a lot of the same thing — omigosh, it’s so terrible that the Hard Left is winning elections!

All I want to do is laugh at this. But I’ll offer the reader a little more than that.

First, if I were to start to observe this at 50,000 feet up, what I would say is you’re seeing a theory I’ve been writing about for four or five years now and described explicitly in my book The  Revivalist Manifesto come to fruition. Namely, that we’re in a new era of American politics, having just in the past few years vacated the one which began with Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s victory in the 1932 election and the passage of the New Deal. We’re no longer volleying back and forth about the methods by which social goods agreed upon by both sides are distributed. The days of William F. Buckley and Daniel Patrick Moynihan having polite conversations over cocktails in tony salons are long gone. That was the Third Era. Now we’re in the Fourth Era, and the next consensus in American politics has not been fully set.

And I would further say that the Buckleys and Moynihans are no longer in position to reset the political consensus. I would argue that Buckley himself would reject, on ideological grounds, the Republican establishment which had so badly faltered when Donald Trump came along to replace it. Whether he would reject John Cornyn or Bill Cassidy, as Republican voters have, is a debatable, if purely academic, question: Cornyn and Cassidy, and lots of others of their ilk, are rapidly receding out of political prominence and that’s largely a good thing. (RELATED: Bye, Bill)

But on the Democrat side, the Moynihans are similarly vanishing. A perfect example is the incredible shrinking Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, who is in the middle of open warfare with the unhinged Liz Warren over the future of the Democrats’ Senate caucus. Warren seems to be winning the majority of the battles in that war, though it isn’t particularly likely that’s going to hold up in November given the rather exotic nature of the people she has endorsed.

Not that Moynihan would be particularly impressed with Schumer, who can’t cease to dumb down American politics with expressions of hyperpartisanship almost anybody could see were dishonest and unproductive. I could give dozens of examples — the latest one from last week appeared in Friday’s Five Quick Things. (RELATED: Five Quick Things: The Increasing Performative Stupidity of Our Friends on the Left)

But the main point I would make is that if the Joneses, Metzls and Schumers of the world are lamenting the rise of outright anti-American communists as the active ingredient in their party, it’s a bit late in the game. (RELATED: Yes, They’re Communists, and Yes, They’re Lying About It. For Now.)

Why didn’t somebody put a stop to this, after all?

Hasan Piker was born in New Jersey, which is too bad. If he’d been born in Turkey like his parents were, Piker would be an excellent candidate for denaturalization and deportation under the 1954 Communist Control Act. What’s clear about Piker is that he hates this country as founded, and furthermore he hates the party he’s exhorting his followers to seize control of. A quote from that rant, given as it was with air supplied by lungs wrapped in a Mao costume…

No more to Trumpism. But no more to the Democrats who compromise, who conciliate, and who betray us. (Applause) No more to the fascist reactionaries, but no more to the Democrats who will collaborate and cooperate with the fascists, who will fund ICE, who will fund Israel, who will help poison the planet, who will stiff workers, and help bosses. We don’t need those Democrats anymore.

The Democrats knew who Hasan Piker was a long time before anybody in the GOP did. Why didn’t they squelch him the way it was demanded that the Right do to Nick Fuentes?

Who turns out to be a Democrat, too, by the way. Wasn’t it funny how that turned out?

They’re terrified of people like this…

Gustavo Gordillo is a classic example of why nobody should mourn the political demise of the Schumers and Metzls of the world.

Not everything is known about his background, other than that he’s Peruvian, and he was brought here as a child by parents who apparently fled the terrorism of the Maoist Shining Path rebels in that country. You would think this would be somebody whose politics wouldn’t mirror those of the Shining Path lunatics, but no — he was radicalized in American educational institutions controlled but poorly policed by liberals, and then he was brought into the political process as a Democrat when that party thought it would be a good idea to let Bernie Sanders run for their nomination in 2016 and 2020. (RELATED: American Education Is in Almost Irredeemable Decline)

Forget about the fact that they screwed Sanders out of the nomination both times. They should never have given him ballot access. He wasn’t a Democrat. He still isn’t. But his little wannabe commissar clown-car minions all are.

That decision had consequences. Now Gordillo’s got more influence in New York City politics, it seems, than Chuck Schumer does.

None of this was an accident, and none of it was difficult to predict.

For 20 years we’ve watched the Democrats abandon the idea of finding the center of American politics and/or winning political arguments on the merits. Bill Clinton’s tactics for doing those things weren’t generally the most honest, but at least the centrist/New Democrat posture was his game. But from the time Barack Obama ascended to the top of the Democrats’ food chain, it’s been a community-organized party which cultivated and coddled every left-wing radical, dysfunctional loon, miserable sorehead, and easily-manipulated fringe dunce it could find.

Under the theory that if you hype up the losers in society with enough volume and consistency, and amplify the effect of that by trashing election integrity and manipulating the political process in absurd ways, you can win elections on pure turnout. (RELATED: Maybe Shut Up, Elissa)

Especially if you can import an electorate from Third World hellholes where the politics of envy and theft is just how it goes.

And then, with that toxic stew of a turnout model, you can drag patently un-American ideas into the Overton Window — and use those ideas to demoralize the other side.

The last part worked exceptionally well for them when it was the John McCains and Bill Cassidys who populated the bulk of GOP politics. It took the “You’re Fired!” guy from The Apprentice to put a stop to sexually confused men in women’s dressing rooms at Target, for crying out loud.

But this was always too smart by half. Letting the rabid dogs run free in the yard was always going to be a threat to the homeowner before the mailman or the neighbor’s kids. So if Van Jones is alarmed by Gustavo Gordillo or Darializa Avila Chevalier, then the question to ask is “Why weren’t you alarmed by Liz Warren and Bernie Sanders? Where did you think that was going?”

Van Jones now says that no-borders is insanity and he won’t be party to that. Well, of course it is. Except Van Jones spent the entirety of Donald Trump’s first term crying crocodile tears over patent dishonesty like “kids in cages” or raising hell about the “Muslim travel ban” — a commonsense measure which stopped immigration from countries the State Department had no real ability to vet migrants from in order to weed out terrorists.

His current rejection of open borders reeks of dishonesty. You might think no-borders DSA rhetoric is insane for reasons beyond that it’s toxic to a general electorate, Van, but you always knew that’s what the radicals in your party were pushing — because they’ve been pushing it for two decades. And yet you couldn’t find any immigrant enforcement actions you were willing to defend. So now you’re surprised that the radicals have won? Well? You can’t beat something with nothing, Mr. Nothing, and a decade of Trump Derangement Syndrome as a substitute for a legitimate policy agenda will ultimately enervate the voters you need to energize.

And that’s when the Maoists start routing you out of your power centers.

Which is where we are.

I have zero sympathy for these people. They created this gain-of-function stupid-communist incursion into American politics, thinking it wouldn’t make them sick. Now that they’re on a ventilator and, apparently, are soon going to be asking Republicans to keep them on life support somehow, the answer has to be that “you made this mess, you clean it up. Take your party back and drive these people out of the institutions you gave to them. Or sit down and shut up.”

READ MORE from Scott McKay:

Five Quick Things: The Increasing Performative Stupidity of Our Friends on the Left

Maybe Shut Up, Elissa

CNBC Proves Why Nobody Cares About Corporate Media Anymore

Image licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic.