The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is facing fresh scrutiny after a new official report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) accused the agency of failing to properly monitor Covid “vaccine” risks.

The report accuses the CDC of blurring the line between safety oversight and “vaccine” promotion.

Following an investigation, NASEM determined that the CDC failed to warn the public of serious health risks associated with the experimental injections.

The report warns that the CDC must “protect ISO’s independence” by insulating its Immunization Safety Office (ISO) from units that push vaccination campaigns, citing persistent public concerns that risk assessments were compromised by political agendas.

- Advertisement -

“CDC should protect ISO’s independence, keeping the office operationally and administratively insulated from units in CDC that carry out promotion or policymaking activities,” the report states.

The report is titled “Vaccine Risk Monitoring and Evaluation at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025).”

NASEM reviewed how the ISO handled “vaccine” safety during the Covid mRNA shot rollout.

While it credited the office with identifying some adverse events, it also revealed gaps in transparency, timeliness, and consistency.

Critics say that these gaps cost lives.

No Mention of CDC’s Delay on Myocarditis Warning

- Advertisement -

Among the glaring omissions: NASEM sidestepped the fact that the CDC withheld the myocarditis risk from the public for six months, despite early reports in its own systems.

As documented in the Congressional Record, CDC officials failed to inform Americans until June 2021, long after young men and boys were already experiencing life-threatening heart inflammation following mRNA injections.

Instead, NASEM praised the ISO for identifying myocarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and blood clot disorders “in time” to guide public health decisions.

That narrative, however, contradicts independent findings showing the agency downplayed and delayed safety disclosures while promoting mass vaccination.

Safety Signals Outpaced by Public Concern

The report admits the ISO was often slow to act on safety signals.

- Advertisement -

Issues like menstrual irregularities, for example, “outpaced analytic response.”

It also found that the CDC lacked clear criteria for when to elevate or investigate safety concerns, leaving troubling signals buried or deferred.

Even more damning, the report concedes that the ISO’s published studies and CDC messaging were consistently tilted toward vaccine promotion, fueling public perception of bias.

Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, who raised early alarms on vaccine-induced myocarditis, said NASEM’s critique validates what whistleblowers and independent scientists have long argued.

“Because the main goal of the CDC was to increase vaccination rates, the agency was biased and did not bring forward important safety information on a timely basis,” McCullough said.

He added that a truly independent data monitoring board, which was meeting monthly during the rollout, would likely have shut down the “vaccination” program for surging excess deaths as early as January 2021.

Recommendations Ignore the Bigger Failure

Despite the damning findings, NASEM’s committee still praised the ISO’s work as “scientifically robust” and claimed its efforts protected public health.

The report even expressed concern that focusing too much on vaccine risks might “detract” from what it called the vaccines’ benefits.

Among its recommendations:

   • Better integration of safety data across systems.

   • Faster review and prioritization of safety signals.

- Advertisement -

   • More transparency in communication and data access.

   • Long-term funding for the ISO.

Critics note these proposals dodge the deeper problem: the CDC was never truly independent of its own “vaccine” agenda.

Calls for Full Data Transparency

The discovery has led to calls for full deidentified data sharing with outside experts, not more promises of reform from an agency already caught covering up risks.

The report ultimately confirms what millions of Americans have suspected since the pandemic began: the CDC prioritized its vaccination campaign over transparency, silencing or delaying information about real harms while Americans paid the price.

READ MORE – Scientists Discover Hidden ‘Kill Switch’ Created by COVID-19 Virus