For years, the J6 pipe bomber case sat in this weird, unresolved space collecting piles of dust. Two “explosives” were placed outside the DNC and RNC, under massive amounts of surveillance, endless tips, and press conferences claiming no stone was left unturned. And yet, there were no leads and no suspect.

That smelled fishier than a tuna factory in July.

READ MORE: Disturbing details emerge: Was Brown U another ‘Charlie Kirk’ style assassination?

Because this is the same FBI that managed to track down MAGA grandparents over social media posts, cell phone pings, and grainy footage. The same FBI that used massive digital dragnets, geofence warrants, and cellphone location data to identify and arrest J6 defendants all over God’s green earth. Non-violent, private citizens were located, charged, and prosecuted with astonishing speed and precision.

And now, there’s more confusion, chaos, and questions regarding the pipe bomb fiasco. According to a new report, the FBI says it had cellphone location data related to the pipe bomber for years but couldn’t decipher it until recently.

Huh?

That goofy explanation has become its own controversy, because once people heard it, a lot of them weren’t buying it, and can you blame them? It’s a hard pill to swallow. Not because people think the FBI is incapable of mistakes—we all know there’s a big Keystone Cops element at work—but because we’ve already seen what the bureau is capable of when the political desire is there. That very real contrast is what keeps this case from ever feeling settled.

But that skepticism isn’t limited to anonymous accounts online. It’s being talked about by analysts and watchdogs who’ve followed the J6 pipe bomb case closely from the get-go.

In the clip below, Mike Benz reacts to revelations that surveillance footage tied to the pipe bomber was deleted while in FBI custody. Benz calls out the absurdity of the chain of custody, evidence handling, and accountability.

And he’s right, because if evidence tied to a major federal investigation was deleted, accidentally or otherwise, that isn’t something to shrug off or explain away. It’s something that demands subpoenas, documentation, and consequences.

🔥Mike Benz demands the arrest of FBI Agent for deleting J6 Pipe Bomb evidence@MikeBenzCyber “…get the chain of custody of this camera and see the last person at the FBI who touched it before it got deleted and then you arrest that person for tampering with evidence for… pic.twitter.com/ULRFHsyAaT

— jay plemons (@jayplemons) December 14, 2025

Even if you accept the most generous explanation available here, that there was no political motive and no intentional cover-up, the level of sloppiness is so over the top, maybe it’s time to burn the FBI down and start over?

So, that brings us back to the cell phone mess. Was that also gross incompetence or yet another big fat lie?

READ MORE: How a Chinese billionaire used his sperm to manufacture 100 US citizens…

In the X post below, the user argues that the FBI has been perfectly capable of analyzing cellphone location data for years and, in fact, relied on similar methods extensively in J6 investigations, as we also mentioned above.

This theory is simple: The FBI didn’t suddenly discover how to read this data. They chose not to use it in the pipe bomber case.

For you guys in the admin: the FBI is lying. They have been perfectly capable of reading cell phone location data given to them by cellular carriers for at least seven years, & are known to have used it in J6 investigations. They chose not to use it for the pipe bomber. pic.twitter.com/QXVjQ3kjul

— Nemets (@Peter_Nimitz) December 15, 2025

Of course, the FBI disputes that theory, and some believe the Wall Street Journal article is a puff piece designed to steer the conversation away from weaponized lies and towards bumbling incompetence.

Here’s a closeup of the key images from the article:

Still, the “big fat lie” argument resonates with many Americans who watched the bureau deploy sweeping digital tools against one group while refusing to solve a case involving an attempted mass-casualty attack for nearly four years because they likely knew the pipe bomber was a black anti-Trump guy.

We recently covered another twist in this bizarre case.

Revolver:

If key details were buried or brushed aside, it would explain how the case stayed “unsolved” for years without ever forcing anyone to revisit the mainstream storyline we were all sold: how white Trump supporters orchestrated the whole thing.

Let’s face it, an unsolved mystery is way more useful than an inconvenient solution.

But before Congress showed renewed interest in the J6 saga, investigative journalist Julie Kelly had been flagging some glaring inconsistencies in the FBI’s pipe bomb timeline. Julie focused on what didn’t add up: conflicts between public claims and internal records, unexplained omissions, and witnesses whose accounts didn’t fit the overnight-planting narrative the FBI and media spent years promoting.

Recently, Julie Kelly began flagging serious issues with the story given by the woman who claimed to have discovered the pipe bomb. The timeline conflicts with what the FBI has long said, and Julie wanted to know why those discrepancies were never addressed.

[…]

This week, Chairman Barry Loudermilk sent a formal request to Karlin Younger, looking for a transcribed interview before the House Select Subcommittee. When you first look at the letter, you can see it’s about oversight. But what you might be missing are the bigger implications.

According to FBI records that were not publicly disclosed in the early stages of the January 6 investigation, Younger told agents she did not see a pipe bomb during an earlier trip to the area that day, but noticed the device sometime between noon and 12:40 p.m.

That directly contradicts the FBI’s long-standing claim that the bombs were planted the night before… a detail critical to framing the incident as part of a broader, premeditated plan.

If Younger’s account is accurate, it doesn’t just shift the timeline. It collapses the old narrative.

It would mean the device was placed in broad daylight while chaos at the Capitol was already unfolding and that the public was presented with a version of events the FBI’s own records didn’t fully support… so, in other words, a lie.

You can read the entire piece here:

The J6 pipe bomb case just took another shady turn…

At best, this latest WSJ story being told is a red flag for bewildering incompetence. But again, it’s a pill that’s so hard to gag down. They want us to believe that a sophisticated federal law enforcement agency with unlimited resources, insane surveillance capabilities, and years of public pressure somehow failed to analyze cell phone data it already had in its possession.

Come on.

Americans are once again asked to accept an explanation that doesn’t line up with what they’ve already seen the FBI do in other cases.

READ MORE: After Bondi Beach terror attack, is it finally time to end the failed ‘female cop’ experiment?

When you combine that history with how aggressively digital surveillance was used elsewhere in the J6 saga, it’s not conspiracy thinking to ask whether this failure was selective. It’s common sense.

You can read the entire WSJ piece here.

— —  —  — —