Trump's lawyers argued that Carroll's allegations were supported by "highly evidentiary" rulings, which included allowing testimony from two other women who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago.

Video Player is loading.

Current Time 0:09

Duration 1:09

Loaded: 40.13%

Remaining Time 1:00

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected President Donald Trump's request to toss a jury's $5 million verdict in a case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll claiming Trump sexually abused and defamed her. 

The high court did not explain their decision not to take up the case, which is typical, the Associated Press reported

Trump's lawyers argued that Carroll's allegations were supported by "highly evidentiary" rulings, which included allowing testimony from two other women who accused Trump of sexual abuse decades ago. The judge broke federal evidence rules in the case, they say, and they argued the case is a distraction from Trump's unique duties as president. 

Trump has denied the accusations from Carroll and the other two accusers. 

Unlock unlimited access

  • No Ads Within Stories
  • No Autoplay Videos
  • VIP access to exclusive Just the News newsmaker events hosted by John Solomon and his team.
  • Support the investigative reporting and honest news presentation you've come to enjoy from Just the News.