Preach It, Brother!

hotair.com

One of the great ironies about the clash of cultures in the West, exemplified in the United States by the different ways that "elites" and ordinary people see racial and immigration politics, and in Great Britain by the arguments over mass migration and the growing influence of Islam, is that ordinary people are stuck in the middle between two alien cultures. 

Advertisement

It's easy to see the conflict as only two-sided, but there are really three. You have the common-sense people who want the destruction of civilized values to stop, the people destroying those values, and the "elites" who side with the destroyers for their own purposes, either out of racial guilt or as a means of gaining or retaining power as the people in the middle rebel against them. 

The second conflict, between the "normies" and the "elite" is perfectly exemplified by this exchange:

The "elite" view is that they have created rules that empower the mass migration movement, so it is illegitimate to criticize the rules and change them to something rational. 

"We let the migrants in, so it's unfair to change the rules."

'Normie": Why? Of course we can change these stupid rules, and have to before everything falls apart. 

Advertisement

That, my friend, is the voice of common sense. "We don't want to die, see our daughters and wives raped, and have Sharia law take over in Britain." Or, "We don't want roving bands of criminals destroying things and killing people."

Seems pretty rational to me. Allowing this to happen was insane, so stop being insane. What could be more reasonable than that? Who cares if it looks "mean." Putting criminals in prison looks mean, if you don't put the reasons for doing so in context. Once you know the context, you want to throw away the keys. 

I often rant about the "elite," and with good reason. They are the bigger source of the problem than the roving gangs, who could be stopped with policies intended to do so. You can't stop any individual crime, but you can clamp down on the conditions that make them common. 

See Beege's post from earlier today. 

Advertisement

Think of horse thieves in the Wild West. It's not like stealing horses would be difficult. After all, they are out in the open, don't need keys, are not "locked" when on a hitching post, or anything like that. It was uncommon because people caught doing so were hanged. Since horses were vital to survival, conditions were created that made horse thieves think twice, three times, or even more before doing something stupid. 

Obviously the opposite has happened in Western countries when it comes to certain crimes, which are tolerated or even celebrated. Rioters are almost never punished, and people even teach others how to do so on Zoom calls and in training. Judges let them go without punishment, politicians bow down to them, and excuses are made for them. 

Same with "teen takeovers." Sure, a few might get arrested, but who goes to jail? Even violent criminals are routinely put through the revolving door until they kill somebody, which is why every horrific crime we see was done by a "known wolf" with a rap sheet a mile long. 

Advertisement

In the UK, being Muslim is an instant excuse, while criticizing Muslim crimes is a ticket to getting a visit from police, or even jail time. 

"Normies" know that this is all wrong, and when an idiot "elite" says that it is "unfair" to kick the perpetrators out when possible, the common sense response is: "Why?" Of course you can do it. 

Instead, the "elite" suppresses even the expression of that sentiment, and is perfectly willing to slander the victims of horrific crimes in order to defend the indefensible. If you can't actually defend the policies in words, then you suppress the dissent instead. 

See Beege's post from earlier today. It captures the insanity of how "elite" Britain responds to justifiable anger.

That's why there is an explosion of rage in the UK. And it's not that there was a boiling cauldron before things hit a breaking point. For all the worry about the explosion of racial violence that justified suppressing facts and opinions, British people merely grumbled about the changes. 

Advertisement

What brought the rage was the denial of reality and the refusal to take measures to make it stop. 

An attempted beheading, it seems, is what sparked the current round of violence, but that is on top of the rape gangs, the street takeovers of Muslims praying, blocking traffic, the displacement of British people from housing to give to illegal migrants, and so much more. 

None of this is just a fact of life. It is the product of policies that can be changed, and people have made clear they want them to be. 

Instead of listening, the "elite" went to war against the "normies." The explosion of rage is not just aimed at the migrants; it is aimed at the people who imposed third-world values on first-world citizens. 

Advertisement

It is self-defense, at least as they see it. 

That isn't a justification for what amounts to a pogrom. The riots in Belfast were awful to behold. 

But utterly predictable. The rioters, at least many of them, thought that they had no other choice. 

It could have been avoided. Getting here was a choice. Lots of us predicted it. The British "elite" decided to suppress and prosecute those who said it was coming. 

Here it is, a new round of "the troubles."

Editor’s Note: Democrat politicians and their radical supporters will do everything they can to interfere with and threaten ICE agents enforcing our immigration laws.

Help us hold these leftists accountable and expose their obstruction. Join HotAir VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.