The two-state solution has existed since 1947: it was rejected by the Arab world and is now used as a political weapon against Israel - Gateway Hispanic
.essb_links.essb_size_s .essb_link_svg_icon svg{height:16px;width:auto}.essb_links.essb_size_s .essb_icon{width:30px !important;height:30px !important}.essb_links.essb_size_s .essb_icon:before{font-size:16px !important;top:7px !important;left:7px !important}.essb_links.essb_size_s li a .essb_network_name{font-size:12px !important;font-weight:400 !important;line-height:12px !important}.essb_links.essb_size_s .essb_totalcount_item .essb_t_l_big,.essb_links.essb_size_s .essb_totalcount_item .essb_t_r_big{font-size:16px !important;line-height:16px !important}.essb_links.essb_size_s .essb_totalcount_item .essb_t_l_big .essb_t_nb_after,.essb_links.essb_size_s .essb_totalcount_item .essb_t_r_big .essb_t_nb_after{font-size:9px !important;line-height:9px !important;margin-top:1px !important}.essb_links.essb_size_s .essb_totalcount_item .essb_t_l_big.essb_total_icon:before,.essb_links.essb_size_s .essb_totalcount_item .essb_t_r_big.essb_total_icon:before{font-size:16px !important;line-height:26px !important}
The two-state solution has been agreed upon since 1947. It had even been negotiated at the Yalta Summit, but it could not be implemented because the Arab States rejected it unanimously: they opted to destroy Israel in a lightning war, which ended in a disastrous setback. Since then, a multitude of wars, insurrections, and bloody aggressions have taken place.
That design of annihilation has been reinforced by the Global Jihad that has been waged for decades, and even more so within the framework of Global Hybrid War, especially after October 7, 2023, when a bloodthirsty attack was carried out that shattered an intangible element within Israel’s existential security: the strength of its borders…
For this reason, it is counterproductive to move toward a declaration at the UN advocating the creation of a Palestinian State, when this goal has never truly been part of the shared vision of Iran’s Islamic Revolution and the currents promoted by the Muslim Brotherhood and other like-minded movements.
Nor is it embraced by a significant portion of the Palestinian leadership, which, on the contrary, has allowed itself to become a pliable instrument of regional powers. On numerous occasions, they have rejected the creation of a Palestinian State if it implies recognition of the existence of Israel.
Their goals are fixed, invariable, totalitarian: to liquidate the State of Israel and the Jewish people; to expel Western powers from the lands of Islam; to overthrow governments that accommodate “infidels and crusaders”; to expand Islam throughout the world by conquest; to consolidate a great Islamic State (a new Caliphate), that raises up the Umma Arabiya e Islamiya and its essential values.
Obviously, the geopolitical struggles of the superpowers, especially the current confrontation between China and the U.S., and the painful and repeated signs of decadence and division in the West, give powerful encouragement to this long-term strategy of war of conquest, which has had chilling effects in Africa, India, Russia, Europe, and the Americas.
The October 7, 2023 attack in Israel was equivalent to the attacks of September 11, 2001, in the U.S. Both sought to provoke a great war, and they succeeded: behind Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Qatar, stands Iran.
The real targets of that attack were to derail the Abraham Accords, which Biden was continuing; and above all, the India–Gulf–Europe Corridor (a rival to China’s Belt and Road Initiative), announced at the G20 in New Delhi. Iran, an ally of China, was escalating the Global Hybrid War.
Pelegrín Castillo Semán, contributor
Originally published by the Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute, a conservative and nonpartisan think tank specializing in policy research, strategic intelligence, and consulting. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Institute. For more information, visit www.miastrategicintel.com
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of Gateway Hispanic.
About The Author Miami Strategic Intelligence InstituteEl Instituto de Inteligencia Estratégica MSI² fue fundado por el Dr. Rafael Marrero, junto con otros cofundadores, como un think tank conservador y no partidista dedicado a promover la estabilidad, la democracia y la prosperidad en Hispanoamérica, al tiempo que enfrenta los desafíos globales que plantea la República Popular China.
Esta organización se especializa en investigación de políticas, inteligencia estratégica, capacitación y consultoría.
Con autores muy destacados con décadas de experiencia combinada en los sectores público y privado, MSI² ofrece soluciones innovadoras y prácticas para desafíos complejos. Su experiencia abarca los ámbitos geopolítico, económico y tecnológico, lo que la convierte en un socio confiable para gobiernos, empresas e instituciones que enfrentan decisiones de alto riesgo.
The Strategic Intelligence Institute MSI² was founded by Dr. Rafael Marrero, together with other co-founders, as a conservative and nonpartisan think tank dedicated to promoting stability, democracy, and prosperity in Hispanic America, while addressing the global challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China.
This organization specializes in policy research, strategic intelligence, training, and consulting.
With highly distinguished contributors boasting decades of combined experience in both the public and private sectors, MSI² delivers innovative and practical solutions to complex challenges. Its expertise spans the geopolitical, economic, and technological fields, making it a trusted partner for governments, businesses, and institutions facing high-stakes decisions.