President Donald Trump made his position crystal clear on Truth Social early this morning, declaring that the United States must gain control of Greenland to safeguard national security interests.

“The United States needs Greenland,” he wrote, adding that “anything less than that is unacceptable.” He went further, warning that without U.S. oversight, adversaries like Russia or China could swoop in, stating, “IF WE DON’T, RUSSIA OR CHINA WILL, AND THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!”

This comes just hours before critical discussions at the White House, where Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are set to meet with Denmark’s Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt.

The push for Greenland isn’t new for Trump, who first floated the idea during his initial term, but the stakes feel higher now with Arctic resources and military positioning in play. Greenland’s vast mineral wealth and strategic location make it a prime target for global powers eyeing dominance in the region. Trump emphasized that incorporating Greenland would strengthen NATO, noting, “Militarily, without the vast power of the United States… NATO becomes far more formidable and effective with Greenland in the hands of the UNITED STATES.”

Yet, Denmark and Greenland have pushed back hard, with Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen asserting at a joint press conference with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen: “If we have to choose between the United States and Denmark here and now, we choose Denmark. We choose NATO. We choose the Kingdom of Denmark. We choose the EU.”

White House officials have echoed Trump’s resolve. Spokesperson Anna Kelly described Greenland as “a strategically important location that is critical from the standpoint of national security,” suggesting that American control would offer better protection against threats in the Arctic. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt didn’t shy away from tougher options, saying last week that “utilizing the US military is always an option.”

Trump himself has been blunt, telling reporters aboard Air Force One, “One way or the other, we’re going to have Greenland.” This boldness has stirred unease among allies, but it aligns with a broader strategy to counter expanding influence from Beijing and Moscow, who have ramped up Arctic activities in recent years.

Denmark’s response has included military moves, with reports from Danish media indicating a deployment of advance troops and equipment to Greenland in preparation for potential escalations. This comes as no surprise given the island’s history under Danish sovereignty for centuries, though the U.S. already maintains a military base there under existing agreements.

Greenland officials remain adamant against any takeover, with Nielsen declaring, “Greenland does not want to be owned by the United States. Greenland does not want to be governed by the United States. Greenland does not want to be part of the United States.” Their office has urged NATO to step in and defend against any aggressive moves.

Back in Washington, not everyone is on board with Trump’s approach. A bipartisan group of U.S. senators, including Democrat Chris Coons and Republican Thom Tillis, introduced a bill to block funding for any occupation or annexation of Greenland. This legislative push highlights divisions even within American politics, with some viewing the president’s tactics as reckless. A delegation of these lawmakers is scheduled to visit Denmark on Friday for further talks, aiming to ease tensions. Meanwhile, analysts point out the “conundrum” this creates for Denmark and Greenland, caught between alliance loyalties and sovereignty concerns.

Some observers speculate that Denmark’s firm stance might stem from deeper EU influences, where globalist agendas prioritize collective control over decisive action against real threats like Chinese expansion. After all, Beijing has invested heavily in Arctic infrastructure, and whispers of backdoor deals can’t be ignored in a world where economic ties often mask strategic grabs. Trump’s insistence cuts through that fog, prioritizing American strength to protect not just U.S. interests but the free world’s edge in a volatile region.

As the Greenland meeting unfolds, the outcome could reshape alliances and Arctic geopolitics. Trump has made it plain he won’t back down, and with military options on the table, the pressure is on Denmark and Greenland to reconsider. Whether through negotiation or firmer measures, securing this territory might be the key to thwarting larger dangers lurking in the north.