'Do you not know?' Medical 'expert' stunned into silence when senator asks about basic mRNA facts * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

www.wnd.com
An Air Force medical technician draws a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine to inoculate Air Force reservists at Joint Base Lewis McChord, Washington, Sept. 12, 2021. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Paolo Felicitas)An Air Force medical technician draws a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine to inoculate Air Force reservists at Joint Base Lewis McChord, Washington, Sept. 12, 2021. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Paolo Felicitas)

It’s been several years since medical regulators inside the government and pharmaceutical companies unleashed the often-injurious mRNA treatments on Americans already suffering from the COVID-19 pandemic.

And just now some of the facts about that orchestration are emerging, including that some of the “experts” are naïve about some of the basic facts involving mRNA.

Including one Stanford University “infectious disease specialist” who was left stunned into silence by questions from U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., about the basics of the treatments.

It happened during a Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations hearing, when Jake Scott, a physician and co-leader of the so-called “Vaccine Integrity Project” claimed vaccines are among the most transparent and safest medical interventions every.

Johnson turned immediately to the basics, asking, “How much do you know about the mRNA technology?”

“A fair amount,” Scott said.

Johnson then explained to Scott what is “true” messenger RNA, which degrades rapidly, and synthetic, which “is engineered to resist breakdown and persist for unknown lengths of time,” according to Jim Hoft’s report at the Gateway Pundit.

Johnson: “Is the mRNA that’s encapsulating the lipid nanoparticle, is that true mRNA?”

Scott: “Is it true mRNA?”

Johnson: “I mean, true mRNA — your mRNA — degrades very rapidly in the body. Correct?”

Scott: “Correct.”

Johnson: “So the mRNA in the injection, is it true mRNA? Does it degrade rapidly in the body?”

There was silence, then Johnson said, “Do you not know?”

Scott: “I do know. Yes, it does, but it sounds…”

Johnson: “No, it does not. It’s modified mRNA, and it’s designed not to degrade. There are studies that show it sticks around in the body. We don’t know how long. The lipid nanoparticle — do you realize that it was designed to permeate difficult barriers, like the blood-brain barrier, like the center barrier? Did you know that?”

Explained the Gateway Pundit, “At that moment, the Senate chamber saw what many Americans have come to realize: so-called ‘experts’ who insisted they were following ‘the science’ are shockingly uninformed about the very shots they demanded the public take.”

Anthony Fauci, formerly Joe Biden’s COVID adviser, once, in fact, insisted that people arguing with his pro-shot agenda were arguing with the “science.”

Scott also admitted that risks of blood clots and myocarditis in young men exist from the shots.

Johnson wasn’t finished, asking Scott, “Did you believe when Fauci told us that the mRNA shot would stay in the arm? Did you believe that? … It’s a simple yes or no. Do you believe the COVID injection stayed in everybody’s arm? Do you believe that’s what happened?”

Scott; “Primarily.”

Johnson unloaded: “You think so, huh? Were you aware of the Japanese FOIA study that was conducted, a biodistribution study where, in rats, it biodistributed all over the body, accumulated in the adrenal glands, in the ovaries? … It distributes all over the body, and when it attaches to a cell, it unloads its mRNA into the cell and turns the cell into a manufacturing cell of a protein that is toxic to it. Do you realize that? Are you aware of that? Just yes or no. Do you know that or not? Because I talk to a lot of doctors who don’t have a clue.”

Silence.

The Daily Caller News Foundation also reported that Scott confessed he was wrong to push for masking for two-year-olds during the pandemic.

And the Gateway Pundit pointed out how Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., was humiliated by witness Aaron Siri, a vaccine lawsuit expert, when Blumenthal tried to belittle the witness.

Blumenthal pointed out to Siri that he was not a medical doctor.

Siri responded with what the Gateway Pundit called “a nuclear truth bomb.”

He revealed, the report said, “A team of respected researchers at Henry Ford Health in Detroit, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, Division Head of Infectious Disease, undertook a massive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study involving 18,468 children enrolled between 2000 and 2016.”

That showed vaccinated children were 3.03 times more likely to develop allergic diseases, 4.29 times more likely to develop asthma, 5.53 times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental disorders — including speech disorders and developmental delays and 5.96 times more likely to develop autoimmune diseases.

And Siri responded to Blumenthal’s “cheap stunt” about his personal qualifications.

Siri noted that for legal cases he deposes experts routinely, “including the world’s leading ones with regards to the vaccines. I have to make my claims based on actual evidence. When I go to court with regards to vaccines, I don’t get to rely on titles.”

Bob Unruh

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is currently a news editor for the WND News Center, and also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially. Read more of Bob Unruh's articles here.