The Decline of Fertility Rates in OECD Countries (1950-2025)
Published
6 hours agoon
December 31, 2025 Graphics/Design:
See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Key TakeawaysFertility rates are collapsing faster than expected around the world.
In Mexico, years of declining fertility rates have pushed average births per woman to 1.9, down from 6.7 in 1950. Moreover, fertility rates in Costa Rica are lower than the U.S., standing at 1.3 births per woman.
This graphic shows total fertility rates in OECD countries compared to 1950, based on data from the United Nationโs World Population Prospects: The 2024 Revision.
A Closer Look at Declining Fertility RatesBelow, we show the total fertility rates of countries, which represents the average number of children a woman would have in her lifetime if current birth rates remain constant.
| ๐ฐ๐ท South Korea | 6.1 | 0.7 | -5.4 |
| ๐จ๐ฑ Chile | 4.8 | 1.1 | -3.7 |
| ๐ฎ๐น Italy | 2.5 | 1.2 | -1.3 |
| ๐ฑ๐น Lithuania | 2.7 | 1.2 | -1.5 |
| ๐ฏ๐ต Japan | 3.6 | 1.2 | -2.4 |
| ๐ช๐ธ Spain | 2.5 | 1.2 | -1.3 |
| ๐ซ๐ฎ Finland | 3.2 | 1.3 | -1.9 |
| ๐ต๐ฑ Poland | 3.7 | 1.3 | -2.4 |
| ๐จ๐ท Costa Rica | 6.3 | 1.3 | -5.0 |
| ๐ฆ๐น Austria | 2.1 | 1.3 | -0.8 |
| ๐จ๐ฆ Canada | 3.4 | 1.3 | -2.1 |
| ๐ฌ๐ท Greece | 2.6 | 1.3 | -1.3 |
| ๐ฑ๐ป Latvia | 2.1 | 1.3 | -0.8 |
| ๐ช๐ช Estonia | 2.3 | 1.4 | -0.9 |
| ๐ง๐ช Belgium | 2.3 | 1.4 | -0.9 |
| ๐ฑ๐บ Luxembourg | 2.0 | 1.4 | -0.6 |
| ๐ณ๐ด Norway | 2.5 | 1.4 | -1.1 |
| ๐ธ๐ช Sweden | 2.3 | 1.4 | -0.9 |
| ๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 3.1 | 1.4 | -1.7 |
| ๐จ๐ญ Switzerland | 2.4 | 1.4 | -1.0 |
| ๐ฉ๐ช Germany | 2.2 | 1.5 | -0.7 |
| ๐จ๐ฟ Czechia | 2.8 | 1.5 | -1.3 |
| ๐ญ๐บ Hungary | 2.6 | 1.5 | -1.1 |
| ๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland | 3.9 | 1.5 | -2.4 |
| ๐ต๐น Portugal | 3.2 | 1.5 | -1.7 |
| ๐ฉ๐ฐ Denmark | 2.6 | 1.5 | -1.1 |
| ๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom | 2.2 | 1.5 | -0.7 |
| ๐ธ๐ฐ Slovakia | 3.6 | 1.6 | -2.0 |
| ๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenia | 3.0 | 1.6 | -1.4 |
| ๐ฎ๐ช Ireland | 3.5 | 1.6 | -1.9 |
| ๐จ๐ด Colombia | 6.4 | 1.6 | -4.8 |
| ๐น๐ท Tรผrkiye | 6.5 | 1.6 | -4.9 |
| ๐บ๐ธ United States | 3.1 | 1.6 | -1.5 |
| ๐ซ๐ท France | 3.0 | 1.6 | -1.4 |
| ๐ฆ๐บ Australia | 3.1 | 1.6 | -1.5 |
| ๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand | 3.6 | 1.6 | -2.0 |
| ๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 6.7 | 1.9 | -4.8 |
| ๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel | 4.6 | 2.8 | -1.8 |
South Koreaโs average fertility rate has plummeted from 6.1 births per woman in 1950 to 0.7 today, one of the fastest declines globally.
Fertility rates in the country fell below the replacement level more than 40 years ago and have steadily declined since. Among the factors driving down birth rates are high childbearing costs, workplace barriers, and a rigid work culture.
As we can see, Chile has the second-lowest total fertility rate in the OECD, at 1.1 births per woman, falling below Japan. In 1950, the total fertility rate was 4.8โhigher than the majority of OECD countries.
Meanwhile, Italy faces the lowest fertility rate among European countries, at 1.2 births per woman, and France has the highest at 1.6.
Similarly, the U.S. sits on the higher end of the pack, with 1.6 births per woman, even as fertility rates hit record lows. Overall, only two OECD countriesโMexico and Israelโhave higher fertility rates.
Learn More on the Voronoi AppTo learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on falling fertility rates of the worldโs 10 biggest countries.
