‘I Didn’t Know About Epstein’s Crimes Because I’m Gay’: Disgraced Former British Ambassador to the US, Lord Peter Mandelson Uses the ‘Gay Card’ To Try To Evade Responsibility | The Gateway Pundit | by Paul Serran
Mandelson refuses to apologize for his long friendship with Epstein.
Mandelson thinks we are all gullible simpletons.
Disgraced former British Ambassador to the US, Lord Mandelson, has claimed to have been ‘kept in the dark’ about Jeffrey Epstein’s sex crimes ‘because he was gay’.
The Telegraph reported:
“The peer was sacked as ambassador to the United States last year after it emerged [that] he had urged the financier to fight for early release from prison.
Lord Mandelson claimed that, because of his sexuality, he was ‘kept separate from what [Epstein] was doing in the sexual side of his life’.”
Mandelson and Epstein goi shopping in the US Virgin Islands.
He described Epstein as his ‘best pal’, but argues he was kept ‘at the edge of this man’s life’.
Mandelson had ‘very close’ links to Epstein.
He nicknamed him Yum Yum.How in God’s name is he still in the Labour Party and House of Lords?
It stinks to high heaven.
— Goosey (@Goosey30111568) December 20, 2025
Mendelson and Epstein having the time of their life on the infamous Little St. James Island.
“In his first interview since losing his job, Lord Mandelson refused to apologize to Epstein’s victims for writing to him after his conviction for sex offences, claiming he was not culpable for any of Epstein’s criminal activity.”
Even a Labour Cabinet minister was led to say he had been guilty of ‘deep naivety’.
Mas was this the extent of his guilt? Check this X post below:
In a BBC interview, Peter Mandelson just claimed he never saw young women on his visits to see Epstein.
Anyway, here’s a photo of Peter Mandelson alongside a scantily clad young woman during a visit to one of Epstein’s houses.
The lying is truly shameless. pic.twitter.com/6PImrpiQD7
— Evolve Politics (@evolvepolitics) January 11, 2026
BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg carried water for him, and asked whether he was never offered sexual favors by Epstein ‘because he was gay’.
“He replied: “Possibly, some people will think that because I’m a gay man, I was unsensitized, or I wasn’t attuned to what was going on. […] I don’t really accept [any guilt]. I think the issue is that because I was a gay man in his circle, I was kept separate from what he was doing in the sexual side of his life. […] I mean, he in a sense had three buckets of people in his life, the business and the financial, the political and the academic, and then what he was doing with young women.”
Read more: