Elderly people sit on a park bench at sunset in Encinitas, Calif., July 5, 2017.(Mike Blake/Reuters)

Humanity adapted to a rising population and will adapt to a shrinking one

The prologue to The Population Bomb (1968), a piece of neo-Malthusian apocalyptica written by Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich and his (uncredited) wife, Anne, featured a prediction that “the battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death.”

Extrapolation is useful as a predictive tool but useless on its own. Trapped in the dead end of finite-resource environmentalism, the Ehrlichs underestimated human ingenuity and human adaptability. Their message, which attracted a vast audience, turned out to be nonsense. It was not the first prophecy of doom to do so, ...

National Review

Continue reading this article with an NRPLUS subscription.

All the access, half the price: join NRPLUS for $5/month

subscribe now

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (through conference calls, social media groups, and more). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going.

GET STARTED