[ CYPHER CODE #649 ]
Young men did not lose status because they failed. They lost access because the criteria changed.

[ CYPHER CODE #650 ]
When identity replaces ability as the filter, trust collapses across media, education, and culture.

[ CYPHER CODE #651 ]
When institutions stopped selecting for excellence, they did not become fairer. They became political.

BRIEFING

Grant here. As we’ve seen in the United States, young men, specifically Caucasians, are suffering in the workforce. But it’s not that young men suddenly became less capable or less ambitious; it’s that the rules around who gets hired, promoted, and admitted radically changed. Let’s get into it.

Starting in the mid-2010s, major institutions began reorienting their selection systems away from individual performance and toward demographic targets. Newsrooms, universities, and cultural gatekeepers didn’t announce this shift as exclusion. But instead they framed it as “progress,” even as entire applicant pools quietly stopped moving forward. And to be completely transparent, the applicant pool left in the dust is primarily young white men.

A new thread making the rounds on X details the breakdown of our institutions over roughly the past two decades and shows how slowly but surely, young Caucasian males have been virtually erased from our media, education, and leadership positions in various companies.

SOURCE

Young white men are being destroyed by our institutions. 🧵

This is the editorial board for Huffington Post.

They stopped hiring young white males -everywhere in Canada and the United States. Incentives were everywhere to specifically NOT hire young white men.

As white men retired, they were replaced by blacks, the Alphabet mob, women, anyone but a young white male.

They stopped hiring straight white males in universities and they reduced admissions dramatically for straight white males.

Standards were lowered to accommodate the unworthy (black, Alphabet mob, women).

And as a consequence, everything has gone to shit for us all, but the damage to a generation of white men is profound.

These images taken from @basicoptimism on Instagram.

DEBRIEFING

What matters here isn’t whether the thread on X overstates its case or sharpens the language. What matters is the underlying mechanisms at play here. Over the past decade, many institutions quietly changed how they define “qualified,” and those changes came with predictable downstream effects for millions of young men.

When hiring and admissions frameworks reward demographic and political alignment ahead of performance, the applicant pool drastically narrows. Some candidates move forward faster, while others stall out entirely. This isn’t malice or conspiracy; it’s just the simple fact these new “progressive” incentives prioritize DEI parameters over demonstrated ability.

And sadly, the end result isn’t broader excellence. It’s the erasure of a generation of men, which inevitably leads to lopsided trust. People begin to question whether outcomes reflect competence or compliance, skill or signaling. And once that doubt sets in, institutions lose the credibility they used to rely on.

And we’re already seeing it in real time: media credibility has dropped, universities are completely politicized, and leadership pipelines narrowed instead of strengthened.

NOW YOU KNOW

Merit didn’t disappear overnight. It was edged out.