đź”»The Weight of Welfare: How SNAP Is Killing America - Cypher News

www.cypher-news.com

[ CYPHER CODE #128 ]
SNAP isn’t a safety net. It’s a trap lined with sugar.

[ CYPHER CODE #129 ]
They call it assistance, but it’s really addiction in disguise.

[ CYPHER CODE #130 ]
When the state becomes your grocer, health stops being the goal.

BRIEFING

Grant here. With all the noise surrounding the government shutdown and its impact on SNAP benefits, Americans are getting a harsh reminder of how a negative EBT balance can send society into complete turmoil. But there’s a bigger story hidden beneath all the chaos, one that’s been quietly unfolding for years. SNAP isn’t just feeding America’s poor; it’s also slowly killing them. Let’s break it down.

A new discussion between Adam Carolla and Dr. Drew just brought this uncomfortable truth back into the spotlight: the more people rely on SNAP, the heavier and less healthy they tend to be. Data shows that women who use EBT are, on average, more than 60 pounds heavier than women who don’t.

This raises a simple but brutal question… how can a program designed to fight hunger be fueling a health crisis?

SOURCE

ADAM CAROLLA: “The average female who gets no free food from the government is 146 lbs. The average SNAP recipient is 211 lbs … Nobody could benefit from a nice fast more than SNAP recipients.”

Subscribe today
Cut through the noise, the spin, and the propaganda.

But, again, this isn’t just something that affects women. It’s hitting men, boys, girls, and even the elderly. Everyone, young and old, is seeing their health decline under this program. And what’s worse, the government openly admits it.

A recent USDA study laid out the numbers, and let me tell ya, they’re not pretty…

SOURCE

Overall, SNAP participants had a higher prevalence of obesity (39 percent) than income-eligible (35 percent) and higher income (31 percent) nonparticipants but results varied by age and gender.

• Boys participating in SNAP had a lower prevalence of obesity than income-eligible nonparticipants (18 versus 26 percent).

• Among adult men, SNAP participants had a higher prevalence of obesity than income-eligible nonparticipants (37 versus 32 percent).

• Girls and adult women participating in SNAP were more likely to be obese compared to their higher income nonparticipant age cohorts. Among adult women, SNAP participants also had a higher rate of obesity compared to income-eligible nonparticipants (52 versus 40 percent).

• Regression-adjusted estimates showed no significant differences in rates of overweight or obesity in children or adults between SNAP participants and nonparticipants. Older adult SNAP participants were less likely to be overweight or obese compared to income-eligible non-participants.

So while the media and liberals keep pushing the idea that these programs are about “fighting hunger,” the truth is it looks a lot more like government-funded obesity.

But why is this happening? Why does receiving government money for food so often translate into packing on the pounds? It turns out SNAP recipients are not just more likely to buy junk food; they are practically encouraged to.

This all appears to be a vicious circle where the USDA, major food companies, and the pharmaceutical industry are all reaping the benefits.

DEBRIEFING

At the end of the day, SNAP was built to “fight hunger,” but it’s evolved into a bloated system that keeps people hooked on absolute junk. And who benefits? Big Food, Big Pharma, and the politicians they bankroll.

The USDA has known for years that a massive chunk of SNAP dollars goes straight into processed snacks, sugary drinks, and fast food. But still they refuse to reform the system. Why? Because the moment they do, the lobbyists start calling. Every soda, chip, and candy manufacturer has their hand in this pie, and they’re making billions off America’s most vulnerable citizens.

So when you look at the numbers, the obesity rates, the diabetes spikes, and the heart disease trends, it’s not hard to see what’s really going on. SNAP isn’t saving lives. It’s shortening them. The program is feeding poverty instead of fixing it, fattening up the very people it claims to help while draining taxpayers dry.

NOW YOU KNOW

SNAP isn’t fighting hunger… it’s feeding disease.