What’s wrong with California elections?

www.americanthinker.com

What’s wrong with California elections? Just days after the June 2 primary, President Donald Trump walked out of a tense “Meet the Press” interview, having been pressed on his claim that California’s elections are rigged. He wasn’t backing down. And with every new batch of late-counted ballots, it’s easy to see why so many Californians are making the same claim.

California’s nonpartisan primary was supposed to be a straightforward affair. Instead, it delivered one of the most bizarre vote-count reversals in recent memory. Despite the Trump administration’s controversial war with Iran and the high-profile law-enforcement operation in Venezuela earlier this year—events Democrats insisted would doom Republican chances—voters in the Golden State showed something remarkable: real appetite for change. Trump-endorsed Steve Hilton, the former Fox News host and British-born conservative reformer, surged early in the governor’s race. In the Los Angeles mayor’s contest, reality-TV star and Trump-backed Spencer Pratt looked poised to force incumbent Karen Bass into a real fight.

Pundits on the left scrambled for explanations. They pointed to the obvious: California’s economic free-fall, the tent cities that have become permanent fixtures on our streets, the housing crisis that has priced working families out of the state they once called home. They’re not wrong about the symptoms. Years of woke progressive experiments and defund-the-police mantras, sanctuary-city policies, and DEI mandates in every corner of government-have turned the once-golden state into a cautionary tale. On paper, those policies sounded compassionate. In practice, they produced record homelessness, sky-high gas prices, and a violent crime wave that hits ordinary Californians hardest.

But the real scandal isn’t just the policy failures. It’s how the votes are being counted. Under California law, election officials have up to 30 days to complete the official canvass. That’s not a bug—it’s the feature of a mail-in ballot system that now dominates the state. Nearly 90% of voters receive ballots by mail, and counties must accept ballots postmarked by Election Day that arrive up to seven days later. Signature verification, curing periods, and the sheer volume mean results trickle in for weeks. County officials can begin processing mail ballots 29 days before Election Day, but the final tally often stretches deep into June.

Here’s what that looked like in real time. In the governor’s race, early returns on election night and the first few days showed Steve Hilton out in front with more than 27 percent. Xavier Becerra, the former Biden cabinet secretary and longtime Democrat fixture, trailed in the mid-20s, with billionaire activist Tom Steyer further back. By the time roughly 60 percent of ballots were counted, Hilton still led. Then the late mail ballots—disproportionately from urban, Democrat strongholds—began pouring in. Suddenly Becerra surged ahead, finishing at 27.2 percent to Hilton’s 25.9 percent. Steyer took 21.5 percent. Hilton still advanced to November, but the momentum shift was unmistakable.

The Los Angeles mayor’s race told an even starker story. Spencer Pratt held a clear lead on election night. As the count dragged on, progressive councilmember Nithya Raman overtook him, and Pratt dropped to third. Karen Bass advances to face Raman in November. Once again, the late-counted ballots flipped the script.

We have no smoking-gun evidence of deliberate fraud. Election officials insist every ballot is verified. But the pattern is impossible to ignore: strong early Republican performance on in-person and early-counted votes, followed by a steady Democrat recovery fueled by mail ballots counted days or weeks later. Trump called it exactly what it looks like to millions of skeptical Californians—a system that invites doubt.

This isn’t about one race or one candidate. It’s about trust. When the same state that pioneered universal mail-in ballots also takes a month to tell us who won, ordinary voters are right to wonder whether their voices are being heard—or slowly diluted. California’s own Secretary of State acknowledges the process can stretch to 30 days precisely because of the mail-in volume. Convenience for some has become suspicion for many.

The good news? The very fact that Hilton and Pratt performed as well as they did—despite the headwinds and the late-count drama—shows the tide really is turning in the Golden State. Californians are fed up with the failed leftist experiment. They want lower taxes, safer streets, and an end to the homelessness industrial complex. They want leaders who put results over rhetoric.But first, we need elections worthy of that trust. Until California reforms its mail-in counting process, shortens the canvass window, and restores confidence in same-day results where possible, the questions will only grow louder. Donald Trump said it plainly during that stormy interview. Millions of Californians heard him-and they’re not going to forget.

Mike Robertson is a contributor to American Thinker. Follow him on X at @Mike_for_MAGA and Reddit.

ChatGPT

Image generated by ChatGPT.