No, NDAA Section 219 Doesn’t Merge the U.S. and Israeli Militaries — Here’s What It Actually Does
Today, a bill passed the House named the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act). Lots of incorrect information has circulated about this bill, so let's dig in and clear up some nonsense.
First of all, if every Democrat votes no on anything, it's probably GREAT for America. That's the case with this bill. This bill does not merge the US and Israeli militaries. That's nonsense.
Who the hell made this crap up that the NDAA "merged" our military with Israel's? All it does is expand the already existing research and technology agreements that exist between the U.S. and Israel, which we have with basically all of our allies. It's like saying that NORAD is a… https://t.co/YzjFAggQ3W
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) July 23, 2026
This bill allows two advanced militaries to work together to ensure safety for both nations. This is similar to agreements we have with other allies.
My dad retired from the Army National Guard, so we often visited MacDill Space Force Base to grocery shop or pick up his medications. It was always a fascinating experience to shop alongside service members from nations all over the world—seeing their varied uniforms, hearing their accents, and exchanging friendly hellos. MacDill is home to CENTCOM, which meant many of our allies were regularly present. They worked side-by-side with American personnel, trained together, and helped shape strategy. This kind of partnership is nothing new, and it’s a good thing.
This obvious lie was made up by The Quincy Institute and a lobby closely tied to the Islamic Republic. Now it’s been widely adopted by a ton of fringe figures and some politicians.
I explained it back in May: https://t.co/2cKlyeqoXq https://t.co/br6Nm8SAlW
— AG (@AGHamilton29) July 23, 2026
Obviously, the Islamic Republic doesn't want Israel to have a competent military and they certainly don't want a close relationship between Israel and the United States. Oh, well.
Recommended
It's a good question, @greg_price11.
According to @grok, the earliest high-profile source is a May 29 piece by the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft.
Quincy was co-founded by Trita Parsi, the self-described lobbyist for Iran.
Now let's look at who spread the lie🧵 https://t.co/syO61pjZGh pic.twitter.com/nFaO4YdaPT
— Eitan Fischberger (@EFischberger) July 23, 2026
Eitan really dug into the roots of this rumor and it's the usual suspects (liars).
One of the biggest reasons for its virality was Thomas Massie, whose initial post on May 31 garnered 3.5m views pic.twitter.com/MhiOcVOKzE
— Eitan Fischberger (@EFischberger) July 23, 2026
Also, disgruntled "so-called" Republicans who lost their primaries and are intent on causing as much confusion as possible before their term is up.
But before Massie, we had Tony Seruga and Douglas MacGregor getting in on the grift pic.twitter.com/Nwi0rPl1w3
— Eitan Fischberger (@EFischberger) July 23, 2026
As well as that former crazy Congresswoman who's been desperately looking for a podcast deal pic.twitter.com/GLjWp3Ffby
— Eitan Fischberger (@EFischberger) July 23, 2026
As I was saying, the usual suspects.
The vampire misinformation around the FY2027 NDAA Section 219 (formerly 224) continues. Despite the baseless ideas and lies pushed about it, it doesn't die.
— John Spencer (@SpencerGuard) July 23, 2026
No, Section 219 does NOT merge the U.S. and Israeli militaries, grant Israel access to U.S. intelligence, factories, or… https://t.co/4bXv1bIH1O
Facts and truth matter.