(Alt-Market)—There are two primary obstacles to finding the truth in any given situation: Cognitive dissonance and propaganda. One always feeds into the other. Effective propaganda works because it caters to the biases or fears of it’s target audience. Cognitive dissonance is the open door through which propaganda enters the mind and controls it.

When it comes to Donald Trump and his administration, there is a LOT of propaganda and cognitive dissonance, and the vast majority of it is weaponized against him rather than for him. If you are unbiased, this is blatantly obvious. If you are hoping for his administration to fail, then you won’t see it at all; you’ll simply find a reason to see the worst.

For those reading this in the expectation that I am going to fuel their hobby of Trump hate, sorry to disappoint. I only care about facts and evidence, I don’t care about the concerns of foreign or domestic movements seeking to engineer public opinion, and there’s a lot of them.

Iran Was Only One Of Many Opponents

There is a vast network of disinformation operatives across the political landscape, mainstream media and social media. All of these people and the groups they work for have been pumping the information space with endless lies, specifically about the war in Iran and the peace negotiations.

Despite the disinformation, the outcome has been a massive win for Trump on almost every level. This position is going to anger some folks – I really don’t care. Some people just don’t comprehend the bigger picture of this event. Others are outright denying the victory because they NEED Trump to lose, or they need the public to interpret the peace deal as a loss.

It’s important to understand that Iran is not the only adversary in the war. It’s not even the most dangerous adversary. There are a number of subversive groups in the US vying to control the narrative. I separate these naysayers into four categories:

The Neo-Con Warmongers: People like John Bolton, Lindsey Graham or Mike Pence (the Atlantic Council crowd) who have long wanted all out annihilation of Iran and they don’t care how many American lives are put at risk to achieve that goal. They’re angry about the peace deal because it sabotages their agenda for total regime change and US occupation of the region.

The Israeli Lobby: Like the Neo-Cons, the Israeli lobby wants a ground invasion and total regime change. Long have they held up the threat of a nuclear Iran as a rationale for US ground deployment. Yes, they have a right to defend themselves. No, it is not America’s job to do their fighting for them. If we do, it must be because our interests are being met in the process.

The Political Left: The left wants a quagmire in Iran because they think it would jump-start their own midterm election campaigns. They are also trying to form an alliance with Islamic interests as a way to tear down western civilization, The leftists see any win for Trump, any positive news, as a threat to their return to power.

The Black Pillers: One thing I’ve noticed about the cognitive dissonance surrounding the Iran deal is that some people, including commentators I have a lot of respect for, have been joining the propaganda train without looking at the bigger picture. Iranian state media has consistently posted misleading claims during negotiations, yet, there are liberty movement personalities who jump on every news release from Iran as if it is golden.

For the black pillers, I think this is about not wanting to be proven wrong. They said the conflict was going to turn into WWIII. They said the Hormuz closure was going to crash the global economy. They said Trump was going to deploy tens-of-thousands of ground troops and that US naval ships would be destroyed by hypersonic missiles. They were all wrong. None of this happened.

I also warned of these outcomes for many years – Outlining the many pitfalls of a long term war. However, as soon as I realized what Trump was actually doing and that a ground invasion was not part of the plan, I had to change my perspective.

How Trump Won

In my article “Global Energy Crisis Or Iranian Surrender In Five Weeks?”, published in March, I explained how Trump’s goal of forcing the Iranian regime to the negotiating table could be achieved WITHOUT a ground invasion (potentially saving thousands of lives). This was my “blockade of the blockade” strategy designed to strangle Iran’s oil industry. Two weeks later, the Trump Admin implemented this exact strategy.

Keep in mind, at the time everyone was saying that Iran was going to fight to the last man and that they had no reason to negotiate. It took longer than five weeks after the blockade to pressure Iran into a deal; it took nine weeks instead. I believe the blockade was integral to this outcome.

The critics (and special interest groups) now argue that the deal is a form of US “capitulation”. Not long ago they were saying a deal was impossible. But every group has different and often ridiculous notions of what victory is supposed to look like. Let’s examine the actual end result Trump has accomplished…

Why The Peace Deal Is An Undeniable Victory For The Trump Admin

At least two levels of Iran leadership destroyed. Iran’s missile and drone attacks declined significantly towards the middle of the war, suggesting their ability to launch has been diminished. Iranian leadership was forced into negotiations. The Strait of Hormuz is wide open without tolls. Iran’s 60% enriched nuclear materials are buried under a mountain range and the weapons program is officially ended. IAEA and US inspectors will supervise the dilution of those materials once they are finally dug up, and will likely remove the Uranium from the country under US watch.

As a side effect, the OPEC oil cartel is ending. The UAE has announced it’s exit, which means other members will exit in order to compete with the UAE’s increased oil production. This means a lot more oil on the market and much lower prices in the long run.

But what did Iran supposedly get in return? This is where the propagandists step in and lie about the details of the deal, often by omission.

Iran Gets Nothing That Can’t Be Easily Taken Away Again

Lets address the common claim that Iran is getting a $300 billion payout from the US. This is false and a deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. First, this potential investment fund does not exist yet, it is simply an idea on paper.  Second, not a single penny of US taxpayer dollars will go to Iran as a part of this fund if it is ever established.

The fund is presented as a possible carrot for the Iranians, made up of private foreign investments largely from neighboring countries. It would be implemented IF the Iranians behave and broadly change their governmental policies, likely over the course of years.

Geopolitical turmoil has prompted price hikes for long-term storage survival food. Heaven’s Harvest is the exception because their all-American food is sourced locally. Use promo code “Patriot” for a nice discount today!

All the leverage is in the hands of the Trump Admin to allow this fund to be created or taken away at any given moment. The claim that this is “reparations” from the US is a lie. The claim that Iran is being paid in exchange for a deal is a lie.

What about the unfreezing of Iranian assets? Is that capitulation for the US? No, it’s not. These assets already belonged to Iran before the war. If the war ends, of course they’re going to get those assets back eventually. Beyond that, the US only holds around $2 billion of the total funds, the rest is scattered across a dozen other countries.

What about tolls on the Hormuz?

There are endless claims that this is going to happen, but it’s not.  Nowhere in the peace deal is there a provision for Iran to institute tolls on the Hormuz. It is true that the current MOU is a foundation for more detailed negotiations over the next 60 days, but again, NO ONE in the Trump Admin has agreed to a toll system, and they won’t. Because doing so would set a precedent for international waterways around the globe and that can’t be allowed by any government.

It should be noted that Iran didn’t even have leverage over the Hormuz during the conflict. US naval operations allowed over 200 oil tankers through the strait without Iran being able to stop them. The insurance companies are a greater obstacle to ships traversing the strait than Iran is.

I believe that the US blockade of the Hormuz did, in fact, lead to serious damage to a number of Iran’s oil wells. I think we will be hearing more about this damage in the coming months. Meaning, Iran’s ability to maintain their economy has just been significantly reduced. I believe the peace deal focuses so much on possible funds exactly because Iranian oil capacity has just been cut. In order to get them to commit, there has to be some light at the end of the tunnel. This is negotiations 101.

What about high oil and gas prices? Isn’t this a detriment for Republicans in the midterms? To be clear, there is no indication of an actual supply shortage during the blockade of the Hormuz. Oil prices are plummeting exactly because the majority of the market shock was caused by speculation, not shortages (once again, the skeptics were wrong). This will result in large cuts at the gas pump over the course of the next six weeks, unless a crisis occurs.

And how about the Uranium, the main reason the war was launched in the first place? Yes, the Iranians were building everything they needed to produce nuclear weapons. And yes, the US now essentially controls those resources.

For years we heard the argument that Iran was close to a nuke, but most of us didn’t believe it because of past government disinformation on Iraqi WMDs. This situation is different. Iran has openly admitted to having nearly 1000 pounds of 60% enriched Uranium, and they admit that it can be further enriched to weapons grade (90%) in a matter of weeks. The war revealed that Iran’s ballistic missiles have far more range that initially predicted, and they have the ability to strike all of Europe including the UK.

The regime asserts that they did not intend to use these components to make an actual bomb, but if this is true, why didn’t they just give up the enriched Uranium in the very beginning? It’s only useful for one thing. Why risk all-out war over it, unless they fully intended to make nukes? Anyone with a brain can see what they were up to.

One might argue that Iran should be allowed to have nukes and that the war was unjust. I disagree.

The authoritarian Islamic regime should not be allowed to have such weapons. Trump was right about this, and yes, the war as it stands was worth it. A culture that believes they will be rewarded in heaven in exchange for righteous religious suicide should never have access to weapons that can destroy entire cities in the blink of an eye. No one is ever going to convince me otherwise.

Some Lessons From The War

If Iran was successful in anything, it was the exploitation of western social media in order to spread disinformation. I suspect they probably had a lot of help with this, perhaps from Russia or China. Meanwhile, they locked their population out of the internet, making it impossible for local dissidents to post contrary information.

The Trump Admin continues to fall behind the curve when it comes to countering foreign propaganda and left-wing propaganda. That said, they’ve improved a lot over the past two months.

Trump’s political base support has not changed despite the war. People who claimed he was going to lose conservatives were utterly wrong. But, if he had initiated a ground war, I think this would not be the case.

Finally, weapons provided to Iran by China and Russia proved to be largely useless against US forces in the region. Hundreds of attempts to target US naval forces failed. One thing that did seem to help Iran was satellite intel from Russia. This did make their attacks on ground targets more effective, but not to the point that they presented a serious threat.

Maybe you don’t agree with the initiation of the war. Maybe you don’t like the end result. But, the fact of the matter is, Trump is getting everything he wanted out of the deal. Iran is getting nothing unless they comply. And, the special interests looking for a ground invasion and large scale conflagration get nothing. In my view, this is a resounding success.

To be sure, the deal could break down and there are plenty of people trying to make it break down. It doesn’t matter. Trump can easily reinstate previous measures, the same measures that forced Iran to the table in the first place. He’s at his leisure. Lets be thankful that the blockade worked and that a ground invasion never entered into the discussion.  Let’s admit that this is a win, and move on.

If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch.  Learn more about it HERE.

Drudge Report is not alone as more popular news aggregators turn against President Trump. For the real news and opinions from across the web that Americans need, check out JD Rucker’s curated links.

Bypass Big Tech Censors

Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare

In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.

America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.

The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.

These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.

High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.

Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.

Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.

Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.

Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.

Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.

Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.

In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.

America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.

Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.