Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Proves Once Again She’s a DEI Hire

During Tuesday’s Supreme Court oral arguments in Little v. Hecox, a case challenging Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raised eyebrows with her questions about legal tailoring. The law bars biological males from competing in women’s and girls’ athletic events at public schools and colleges, aiming to preserve fairness based on inherent physical differences. Idaho officials argue the measure protects female athletes from unfair competition, a position backed by the U.S. government as amicus curiae.
Hashim Mooppan, arguing for the United States in support of Idaho, faced probing from Jackson on why states cannot simply grant individual exceptions to the ban for those who claim no competitive advantage applies to them.
Jackson said, “I guess I’m still struggling to understand why the state would have to have perfectly tailored laws. I would think the state would just have to make exceptions where people can demonstrate that the justification that makes the state’s conduct constitutional doesn’t apply to them.”
Mooppan replied directly: “So making exceptions is tailoring your law. That’s literally what it means, to tailor your law.”
This straightforward correction came amid broader discussions on whether the law withstands intermediate scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause, without needing case-by-case carve-outs that could undermine its purpose.
Ketanji Brown-Jackson: “We are now looking at the definition of a girl and we’re saying only people who were girl-assigned at birth qualify.”
Uhhh yes. pic.twitter.com/bm4U4byxPw
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) January 13, 2026
The case stems from a lawsuit by Lindsay Hecox, a transgender woman seeking to join Boise State University’s women’s track team, and another plaintiff. Lower courts sided with them, issuing an injunction against the law. Idaho appealed, contending that allowing exceptions for transgender athletes who suppress testosterone would force schools into invasive monitoring and erode the categorical sex-based separation that has long defined sports. As Mooppan noted in arguments, such demands could elevate scrutiny beyond what’s required, effectively treating sex classifications like race-based ones.
Critics see Jackson’s confusion as part of a pattern, recalling her Senate confirmation where she declined to define “woman,” citing lack of biological expertise.
SEN. BLACKBURN: “Can you provide a definition of the word ‘woman’?”
JACKSON: “No, I can’t”
BLACKBURN: “You can’t?”
JACKSON: “I’m not a biologist” pic.twitter.com/i7Rg83z5Y4
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 23, 2022
In this hearing, her line of questioning appeared to favor individualized assessments over broad protections, potentially opening doors to subjective claims that blur biological lines. Some observers speculate this aligns with efforts to redefine gender norms, ignoring evidence of persistent male advantages post-puberty, as detailed in amicus briefs from female athletes who’ve lost opportunities to transgender competitors.
Biblical principles affirm that God created humanity male and female, a distinction meant to be honored in all aspects of life, including physical pursuits. Idaho’s law echoes this by safeguarding spaces where women can excel without compromise. Reports from outlets like ESPN highlight the passionate demonstrations outside the Court, with supporters of the ban emphasizing safety and equity for girls.
The justices seemed divided, with conservatives like Amy Coney Barrett questioning the feasibility of as-applied challenges for tiny subgroups. Liberal justices, including Jackson, pressed on whether the law discriminates against transgender individuals as a class. SCOTUSblog analysis suggests the Court may uphold the ban, given precedents allowing sex separations in sports under Title IX.
A ruling expected by June could set nationwide standards, either reinforcing states’ rights to protect women’s athletics or mandating accommodations that invite chaos. For now, Jackson’s exchange serves as a reminder of the high stakes in interpreting laws that touch on biology, identity, and justice.
Preparing for the Unexpected: Your Essential Partner in Health ReadinessIn an increasingly unpredictable world—where supply chain disruptions, natural disasters, and global travel can leave us vulnerable to sudden health challenges—being prepared isn’t just smart; it’s essential.
That’s where Jase Medical steps in, offering innovative solutions that empower individuals and families to take control of their health with emergency medication kits designed for real-life scenarios. As someone who’s always advocated for proactive wellness, I was impressed by how Jase Medical combines expert medical guidance with convenient, customizable options to ensure you’re never caught off guard.
At the heart of their offerings is the Jase Case, a comprehensive emergency antibiotic kit priced at just $289.95. This powerhouse contains five life-saving antibiotics and five vital symptom-relief medications, capable of treating over 50 common infections—from respiratory issues and skin conditions to traveler’s diarrhea and more.
What sets it apart? It’s fully customizable with 28 add-on options, including a specialized KidCase for children ages 2-11, making it ideal for families.
Whether you’re stocking up for home emergencies or preparing for remote adventures, the Jase Case provides peace of mind with medications that boast extended shelf lives—up to five years or longer when stored properly, with studies showing 90% potency retention even after 20 years.
For those on the move, the Jase Go travel med kit at $129.95 is a game-changer. Curated by physicians, it addresses over 30 common travel ailments, from digestive upsets to minor injuries, ensuring explorers, hikers, and globetrotters can handle health hiccups without derailing their plans.
And for targeted concerns, Jase Medical offers specialized kits like the UTI Kit ($99.95), which includes test strips and treatments for urinary tract infections, vaginal candidiasis, and even jock itch, or the Parasites Kit (starting at $199.95), featuring compounded Ivermectin and Mebendazole to combat internal and external parasitic infections.
But Jase Medical isn’t just about one-off kits; their Jase Daily service provides an extended supply of your ongoing prescriptions, supporting hundreds of medications for chronic conditions like diabetes, heart health, high blood pressure, mental health, and more. This ensures long-term preparedness, safeguarding against factory shutdowns or extreme weather that could interrupt your regular supply.
The process couldn’t be simpler or more reassuring. Start by customizing your order online, then benefit from a thorough review by a team of world-class physicians who ensure safety and accuracy. In most cases, prescriptions are issued after a quick consultation—sometimes just a call to clarify allergies or needs—and your kit arrives discreetly at your door. While they don’t accept traditional health insurance, many customers use HSA cards, and refills are available for added convenience.
What truly stands out is the real-world impact. As radio host Glenn Beck puts it, “The supply lines for antibiotics already are stressed to the max. Please have some antibiotics on hand… You can do it through Jase.”
One satisfied customer shared, “It could have been a nightmare. Instead, the best trip we’ve had,” after their kit turned a potential health crisis into a minor blip during a family vacation.
In a time when health uncertainties loom larger than ever, Jase Medical isn’t just selling products—it’s delivering empowerment. Don’t wait for the next disruption; visit Patriot.TV/meds today to build your personalized emergency plan and step into a more secure tomorrow. Your health, and your family’s, deserves nothing less.