How ‘Young Washington’ Defeated ‘Supergirl’ at the Box Office

Supergirl entered the summer with major studio backing and high expectations, but the film is now on track to be one of the year’s biggest box office misses. After a soft opening, it dropped sharply in its second weekend. Competition from Minions & Monsters and Toy Story 5 added pressure, but the real surprise came from a smaller film. The historical drama Young Washington surged into the top three in its debut.
Young Washington did more than just hold its ground. It outperformed expectations and proved that a focused film with a clear audience can beat a costly superhero release. While Supergirl struggled to keep momentum, Young Washington connected quickly and delivered a strong opening result that set the tone for its success.

Supergirl was weighed down by weak audience response. The film earned a B- CinemaScore, a sign that interest would drop fast. With a reported $170 million budget, it now faces a steep climb to recover costs. Young Washington, by contrast, was built for efficiency and audience alignment from the start.
Released by Angel Studios, Young Washington follows a proven model of faith-based and patriotic films aimed at a specific audience. Previous titles like David and King of Kings showed how this approach can deliver consistent returns. According to Deadline, the film performed strongest in heartland markets, including Megaplex 18 Thanksgiving Point in Utah. That support translated into an A CinemaScore, signaling strong word of mouth.

Critic scores between the two films are closer than many expected. Young Washington holds a 60 percent fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes, while Supergirl sits at 54 percent rotten rating. The gap is small, but the context matters. Supergirl has more than 300 reviews, while Young Washington has fewer than 50, giving it a tighter and more favorable sample.
Among top critics, the difference in exposure is even clearer. Young Washington has about a dozen top critic reviews, with roughly half marked positive. Supergirl has more than 50, and many are negative. That broader scrutiny has hurt Supergirl, while Young Washington has thrived with stronger audience alignment than critical consensus. Strange that so many establishment critics decided to skip Young Washington during our nation’s 250th, but that’s probably a topic for another post.
Both films were pulled into cultural debates, but the outcomes were very different. During the press tour, Supergirl star Milly Alcock drew backlash for comments tied to Christian fathers and sexual identity politics. That shifted attention away from the film and likely hurt its appeal with key audiences.

Young Washington leaned into a clear message instead. Angel Studios promoted patriotic themes and even launched a “Patriotic States Leaderboard” to highlight regional support. The strategy connected with audiences who feel overlooked by mainstream studios, especially during the nation’s 250th anniversary celebration.
The results show a clear divide. Young Washington drew strong support from a defined audience and delivered on expectations. Supergirl struggled to unify its base, with mixed reviews and off-screen distractions limiting its reach.

Financially, the contrast is hard to ignore. Supergirl opened to $37.1 million against a $170 million budget, putting it in a weak position early. Young Washington, made for about $20 million, has already surpassed its production cost and is moving toward profitability.
The outcome is decisive. Young Washington has secured a sequel (1776) and established itself as a clear win for Angel Studios. Supergirl now faces an uncertain path forward. In a crowded summer, discipline and audience focus beat scale and brand power.
***